Paxman was incredibly rude..milliband handled it well

So, tell me, how do you feel about the accusation in the press that Cameron and Clegg refused to answer repeated requests under the freedom of information act relating to Westminster paedophiles?

Interesting that the PM was very vocal about social workers, that they should face 5 years in jail if they fail to report child abuse, with the revelation that Cameron and Clegg have been trying to block significant information outlining child abuse at government level.

Also interesting that he said the idea of an establishment paedophile cover up as 'conspiracy theory', yet contradicted his Home Secretary, Theresa May, who admitted that, prima facie, there was an establishment cover up.

---------- Post added 30-03-2015 at 17:29 ----------

I feel that it is a long established principle of British public life that a senior politician says nothing that is likely to influence the outcome of a pending public enquiry one way or the other.

So why did Cameron dismiss the claims by sexual abuse victims after calling claims of Home Office cover-up a 'conspiracy theory'?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2831025/Cameron-attacked-sexual-abuse-victims-calling-claims-Home-Office-cover-conspiracy-theory.html

Interesting that the PM was very vocal about social workers, that they should face 5 years in jail if they fail to report child abuse, with the revelation that Cameron and Clegg have been trying to block significant information outlining child abuse at government level.

Also interesting that he said the idea of an establishment paedophile cover up as 'conspiracy theory', yet contradicted his Home Secretary, Theresa May, who admitted that, prima facie, there was an establishment cover up.

 

---------- Post added 30-03-2015 at 17:29 ----------

 

 

So why did Cameron dismiss the claims by sexual abuse victims after calling claims of Home Office cover-up a 'conspiracy theory'?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2831025/Cameron-attacked-sexual-abuse-victims-calling-claims-Home-Office-cover-conspiracy-theory.html

Where has he "dismissed" such claims? I would have thought instructing the Home Secretary to carry out a root and branch enquiry into these allegations is more than any PM has done. Remember these allegations are not new, Geoffrey Dickens stated this when Thatcher was in power.

I think Paxman should interview some of the outside candidates, like Bez:

Have a watch of this from 53 minutes 30 seconds in, his key reason why people should vote for him:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b05gwrbl/sunday-politics-north-west-29032015

Louis Walsh now face the Axe from x Factor, pity- he could have done paxman's

interveiw on Cameron and Mili

Where has he "dismissed" such claims? I would have thought instructing the Home Secretary to carry out a root and branch enquiry into these allegations is more than any PM has done. Remember these allegations are not new, Geoffrey Dickens stated this when Thatcher was in power.

Interesting that the PM was very vocal about social workers, that they should face 5 years in jail if they fail to report child abuse, with the revelation that Cameron and Clegg have been trying to block significant information outlining child abuse at government level.

Also interesting that he said the idea of an establishment paedophile cover up as 'conspiracy theory', yet contradicted his Home Secretary, Theresa May, who admitted that, prima facie, there was an establishment cover up.

 

---------- Post added 30-03-2015 at 17:29 ----------

 

 

So why did Cameron dismiss the claims by sexual abuse victims after calling claims of Home Office cover-up a 'conspiracy theory'?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2831025/Cameron-attacked-sexual-abuse-victims-calling-claims-Home-Office-cover-conspiracy-theory.html

I feel that it is a long established principle of British public life that a senior politician says nothing that is likely to influence the outcome of a pending public enquiry one way or the other.

But Cameron did speak about the issue while the enquiry in pending.

---------- Post added 01-04-2015 at 15:12 ----------

According to the press, he refused to answer freedom of information requests repeatedly, along with Clegg, about information he had regarding the Westminster paedophile scandal and only acknowledged them when they were threatened with the high court. See link in my post above, answering Alan Ladd's post.

 

Also, did you see how the tories voted in response to John Mann MPs bid to get this all out in to the open, and exposing establishment paedophiles?

 

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5530/how-mps-voted-on-move-to-change-official-secrets-act-over-csa

 

Apart from a handful of tory rebels, looks like this vote goes straight down party lines, doesn't it?

Scandalous. Also if they have nothing to fear, what are they trying to hide?

Andrew Marr should have done the show and he's faster with his questions-

Paxman out dated.

It's getting those two idiots to actually answer the questions that's important. Paxman did right to ask questions that made their arses twitch. Don't forget those two are surrounded by advisors, make up artists:P etc, from getting out of their cots in the morning til beddy- by time.