John

Common problem using mail that comes with the hosting provider are as follows: 1) Mail is deleted after X days 2) Storage limits 3) Alias limits 4) Attachment limits You will probably find in most cases that you are given low limits so that they can charge additional fee to increase them. You could pop the mail to get around problem 1 and 2.

Reviews are always going to be bias because disgruntled customers will go out of their way to post a bad review whereas someone who is satisfied with the service will ever rarely ever give reviews. Dismissing this company based on 42 reviews when they have customer base of 5 Million is grossly unfair. I haven't had a problem with zoho mail that I setup for a client and I would quiet happily use it myself if the needs arrises. I personally use gmail for this instead but that was free from years ago.

It is still there you just need to change the timeline. Beside, they have put the deleted web page back up on their site and added a paragraph at the top. They had nothing to do with the cladding. Deleting this information which is what they did originally was probably not the best course of action to take given it would only serve to attract the attention of trolls and that is the last thing this company needs.

So this company, witt uk group, decided to delete a web page... http://wittukgroup.co.uk/grenfell-tower-london-w11-1tq-regeneration-project/ Good job it was archived https://web.archive.org/web/20170614035707/http://wittukgroup.co.uk/grenfell-tower-london-w11-1tq-regeneration-project/

I bet that is where she was keeping her goats.

Billy no mates!

When this fails, they'll be looking for a scapegoat.

Cassetteboy vs Theresa May VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE

No, the lane was the factor here. If it wasn't then they wouldn't be an accident. The only reason why the white car caught up is because the black car is about to make a 60 degree turn toward M1 North crossing in front of the white car path and so the black car had to slow down in order to make that turn which resulted in giving the appearance that the white car had speeded up. The onus on the person making the lane change that it is safe to do so.

I looked and... The white car is perfectly entitled to. The Arrow prior to entering the roundabout said so. It totally does matter. The road markings you point out are for the benefit of the traffic coming from the other set of traffic lights. If you ignore the arrows telling you that you can only go straight ahead in this lane and instead follow through the lane markings belonging to the other set of lights that takes you to the left then expect a high chance of causing an accident. We have agreed that the lane markings could be better. Even so, the black car is 100% at fault for not following the straight ahead only instruction prior to entering the roundabout.

Totally agree with this. One thing worth pointing out is that the only reason why the white car caught up is because the black car is about to make 90 degree turn toward M1N in front of the white car and so the black car had to slow down in order to make that turn which resulted in giving the appearance that the white car had speeded up.

Best watching TheNugget videos a few times.

The problem with lane markings once you are on the roundabout aren't easily solvable because the traffic is alternatively flowing from 2 different set of traffic lights and each set has its own rules for which lane goes where. So, the road marking has to account for traffic flowing from either set of light with minimal confusion from both point of view. What ultimately happened was the driver of the black car was following through the lines that was meant for the traffic flowing from the other set of traffic lights. What they didn't do was follow the lane rules given to them on approach to the roundabout which was straight ahead only. If driver in the black car did't see the sign on the road on approach to the roundabout then they were either tailgating the car in front or were simply were not paying attention.

The white car was on the inside lane and is free to go either left on to M1N or go straight ahead toward Rotherham. The driver of the white car choose to go straight ahead toward Rotherham and is perfectly entitled to do so and that is exactly what it was doing. The black car was in middle lane and going by the video was attempting to turn left toward M1N by crossing into the path of any traffic going toward Rotherham on the inside lane. The black car was totally in the wrong lane to make that sort of manoeuvre. The road marking for the middle lane clearly state you can only go straight ahead toward Bawtry / M1S. They are NOT allowed to go M1N from the middle lane. 100% black car fault. The road marking for M1N with the arrow pointing straight ahead is wrong. It should be pointing to the left. Even so, this was not the cause of the accident.

More info: https://www.thenewpoundcoin.com/ I've got loads of old £1 in a piggy bank to spend between now and October 15th.

What exactly does your business do? Do you have a website?

The city of Sheffield, being a hilly area was more prone to gas pockets, and so had the highest number of sewer gas destructor lamps. They still have many of these lamps and some of them are still functioning. http://www.amusingplanet.com/2016/12/the-sewer-gas-destructor-lamps-of.html Bottom 4 photos are based in Sheffield

Check out Sheffield Board Games Club. They play every Tuesday evening at the University Arms. http://www.sheffieldboardgamers.com/

Not yet in UK but it gives you an idea of where the future of shopping in supermarket is likely to be heading. http://venturebeat.com/2016/12/05/amazon-launches-amazon-go-a-brick-and-mortar-grocery-store-that-does-away-with-checkouts/ Pro: Shoplifting reduced Less staff Probably cheaper products due to above 2 Saves time Cons: Unemployment 1984

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-38063742 Surely this is an accident waiting to happen. To make matters worst, this trick only works once for regular users using that road.

Clear type font don't work on a non LCD type monitor so it is worth turning it off if you are using an old fashion monitor / TV. In rare cases, some LCD monitors and/or graphic card don't display their RGB in that order, i.e. it is displayed in BGR order which cause clear type to incorrectly work as intended. I would expect there is an option to correct this without the need to turn off clear type. You should try this first. If you are not running the screen at the monitor native resolution, it'll alpha blend pixels (blur) in order to compensate for the different in resolution. Clear type won't work effectively once it does this. Set the screen resolution to match the monitor native resolution would solve this. Be aware that it is possible that your problem is caused by both the above. If all else fails, turn off clear type. Your font will become readable when you do this but it'll look pixelated and won't look as good at lower resolutions compared to a correctly configured true type setting.

Crazy... Sell your fivers for £300! https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1833531/some-new-plastic-5-notes-are-selling-for-more-than-300-and-heres-how-to-tell-if-you-have-one/

You will still see things being priced on shelves at 62p, 81p, 93p, £1.99, whatever, at the supermarket even if you decide to get rid of 1p and 2p from circulation. It is the final bill that get rounded to nearest 5p. So, the annual budget can still say beer has increase by 1 pence.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37338979 Have you spotted one yet?

I'll give you £2 for it.