rickiethecat Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1379622/Dog-attack-Staffordshire-bull-terrier-mauls-girl-7-chewing-eyelid-exposing-skull.html I see that once again a child has been savaged by a vicious dog and yet again it's the usual breed, a staffordshire bull terrier. Why do staffy apologists always insist that their dog is harmless when it's always the same breed that's savaging innocent children? It has to be time for the government to seriously clamp down on dangerous dogs and ban people from keeping breeds such as staffies as pets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 It's not always a staffy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riche Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Same reason its always a well hard CHAV scum bag who ownes them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saffy Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 I'm with BritPat .. it's not always a Staffy. My daughter's boyfriend has one who is the most gorgeous, lovable thing. Prior to meeting Deckster (spelt like that as his last owner was a DJ), I was always a bit wary of them I have to admit. Riche .. I love your generalisation .. were you educated at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie1957 Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 A few years ago it was popular with the press to report attacks by Alsatian dogs while ignoring the attacks by other dogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobthebobs Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 I'm with BritPat .. it's not always a Staffy. My daughter's boyfriend has one who is the most gorgeous, lovable thing. Prior to meeting Deckster (spelt like that as his last owner was a DJ), I was always a bit wary of them I have to admit. Riche .. I love your generalisation .. were you educated at all? A generalisation that is, generally, true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 A generalisation that is, generally, true. So it's generally true that it's always a staffy? Off to logic 101 with you, no tea until you have completed chapter 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobthebobs Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 So it's generally true that it's always a staffy? Off to logic 101 with you, no tea until you have completed chapter 1. Did you read the post that was quoted, and then read the post they quoted? Obviously reading comprehension isn't one of your strongest abilities. Back to Year 4 for you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
viglen Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 what bull its not staffys its the owners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Did you read the post that was quoted, and then read the post they quoted? Obviously reading comprehension isn't one of your strongest abilities. Back to Year 4 for you! Yep read it, no evidence cited claiming that dogs that attack children are usually staffies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.