Minesadouble Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 All of them are equally pernicious and divisive I agree with Waltheof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabberwocky Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 All of them are equally pernicious and divisive The fifth day Whelkists arent! All we wish to do is serve our god and... make everyone else serve him too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyloxley Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I'm tempted to vote for the buddists so they don't feel left out, after all it's not their fault they're not allowed to blow themselves to bits on trains and stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minesadouble Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I'm tempted to vote for the buddists so they don't feel left out, after all it's not their fault they're not allowed to blow themselves to bits on trains and stuff. What happened to the other post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyloxley Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 What happened to the other post Which other post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minesadouble Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Which other post? Ha ha ...you can tell I'm ill - Sorry wrong thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purdyamos Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think the biggest danger in the world is the disturbing ignorance of what the word 'secular' actually means. It does not mean atheism. It means religion is a private individual matter and does not have power over public discourse, governance, laws or communal matters. It's one of the biggest errors made over and over again on the religious threads, from all sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeP Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think the biggest danger in the world is the disturbing ignorance of what the word 'secular' actually means. It does not mean atheism. It means religion is a private individual matter and does not have power over public discourse, governance, laws or communal matters. Indeed - I will only start worrying about this issue when the religions become theocracies, irrespective of whether they're Christian, Muslim or the Church of Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Indeed - I will only start worrying about this issue when the religions become theocracies, irrespective of whether they're Christian, Muslim or the Church of Bob. A Bob theocracy would indeed be scarey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think the biggest danger in the world is the disturbing ignorance of what the word 'secular' actually means. It does not mean atheism. It means religion is a private individual matter and does not have power over public discourse, governance, laws or communal matters. It's one of the biggest errors made over and over again on the religious threads, from all sides. Is that right Purdy? I always thought "secular" means someone who is neutral as far as religion is concerned. Secularists are neither religious or atheists and have little or no concern, thought or feelings either way? So can I ask what secular means for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now