southcoast Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Should put him on a direct flight to Amman, and deal with the fall out from the European Court after. In 2010 France deported many gypsies back to Bulgaria and Romania, with no consequence from the European Court, and they weren't even hatching plots to kill people.[/quote] Nope they are going to be brought to account for this,you cant just do as you please when your in the EU.just wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 You just dont get it do you, in our country its innocent until proven otherwise,I dont know why I bother with people like you: Well i woudn't wipe my broad buttocks on a raghead terrorist hugging sort like you so I guess we're even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Should put him on a direct flight to Amman, and deal with the fall out from the European Court after. In 2010 France deported many gypsies back to Bulgaria and Romania, with no consequence from the European Court, and they weren't even hatching plots to kill people. Nope they are going to be brought to account for this,you cant just do as you please when your in the EU.just wait and see. It won't reverse what happened though will it? Just like if we did deport this piece of filth, whatever conseqences from the EU ain't going to bring him back from Jordan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 I'm sorry did i call bin ladins european head of terrorism a "mad raghead"? I must be evil. Naughty me. If I were you I'd be condemning his release as it will only hurt muslims rather than whining about how a terrorist animal is described. oops dont think bin ladins going anywhere.see its easy to become a spelling snob isnt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGELFIRE1 Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Why don't we just deport him and not care for his future. Oh yeah, we have a justice system that protects everyone, even those who you feel may not deserve it. Direct hit, bullseye, on the money and hit the nail on the head. Who gives a toss for this terorist, stick him on the first Jordan bound plane available. Angel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 It won't reverse what happened though will it? Just like if we did deport this piece of filth, whatever conseqences from the EU ain't going to bring him back from Jordan. Just like this case its about the rule of law,we all have to stick to the rules and then we can take the moral high ground,otherwise its the mob rule and we dont want that do we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 If 'Rag-head' or 'Towel-head' is unacceptable, why is it OK to refer to Northerners as 'The Flat 'at and Ferret Brigade' or to refer to Southerners as 'Toffs in Toppers'? I'm well aware that a Keffiyeh is neither a 'rag' or a 'towel'. It's a sort of little cotton sheet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugo stiglitz Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 he's 'wanted' in six countries, its ok that means he's fine here then !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Should put him on a direct flight to Amman, and deal with the fall out from the European Court after. In 2010 France deported many gypsies back to Bulgaria and Romania, with no consequence from the European Court, and they weren't even hatching plots to kill people. Nope they are going to be brought to account for this,you cant just do as you please when your in the EU.just wait and see. Really? Right to move and right of residence for up to three months All Union citizens have the right to enter another Member State by virtue of having an identity card or valid passport. Under no circumstances can an entry or exit visa be required. Where the citizens concerned do not have travel documents, the host Member State must afford them every reasonable means in obtaining the requisite documents or having them sent. Family members who do not have the nationality of a Member State enjoy the same rights as the citizen who they have accompanied. They may be subject to a short-stay visa requirement under Regulation (EC) No 539/2001. Residence permits will be deemed equivalent to short-stay visas. For stays of less than three months, the only requirement on Union citizens is that they possess a valid identity document or passport. The host Member State may require the persons concerned to register their presence in the country within a reasonable and non-discriminatory period of time. Right of residence for more than three months The right of residence for more than three months remains subject to certain conditions. Applicants must: either be engaged in economic activity (on an employed or self-employed basis); or have sufficient resources and sickness insurance to ensure that they do not become a burden on the social services of the host Member State during their stay. The Member States may not specify a minimum amount which they deem sufficient, but they must take account of personal circumstances; or be following vocational training as a student and have sufficient resources and sickness insurance to ensure that they do not become a burden on the social services of the host Member State during their stay; or be a family member of a Union citizen who falls into one of the above categories... Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health Union citizens or members of their family may be expelled from the host Member State on grounds of public policy, public security or public health. Under no circumstances may an expulsion decision be taken on economic grounds. Measures affecting freedom of movement and residence must comply with the proportionality principle and be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned. Such conduct must represent a sufficiently serious and present threat which affects the fundamental interests of the state. Previous criminal convictions do not automatically justify expulsion. The mere fact that the entry documents used by the individual concerned have expired does not constitute grounds for such a measure. In any event, before taking an expulsion decision, the Member State must assess a number of factors such as the period for which the individual concerned has been resident, his or her age, degree of integration and family situation in the host Member State and links with the country of origin. Only in exceptional circumstances, for overriding considerations of public security, can expulsion orders be served on a Union citizen if he has resided in the host country for ten years or if he is a minor. Do you think the French will be able to find anything in that lot to defend their action? Then, of course, there is also the 'small print' in the Accession treaty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 he's 'wanted' in six countries, its ok that means he's fine here then !! Send him to one of those. what they do with him once they've finished with him is their business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.