andygardener Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Even worse . Shouldn't be here . End of Of course he should. If he wasn't here then as a known international terrorist his "human rights" might be violated. The greatest test of a civilized country is how we treat out most deadly enemies and in order to ensure the horrors of WW2 could not happen again we introduced the EDHR just after we'd hung all the nazis. By paying for his house, his wives, his many spawn and his legal fees we prove Britain is civilised and not at all a complete soft touch for terrorist scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapleboy Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Of course he should. If he wasn't here then as a known international terrorist his "human rights" might be violated. The greatest test of a civilized country is how we treat out most deadly enemies and in order to ensure the horrors of WW2 could not happen again we introduced the EDHR just after we'd hung all the nazis. By paying for his house, his wives, his many spawn and his legal fees we prove Britain is civilised and not at all a complete soft touch for terrorist scum.Irony well done is always a pleasure to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Of course he should. If he wasn't here then as a known international terrorist his "human rights" might be violated. The greatest test of a civilized country is how we treat out most deadly enemies and in order to ensure the horrors of WW2 could not happen again we introduced the EDHR just after we'd hung all the nazis. By paying for his house, his wives, his many spawn and his legal fees we prove Britain is civilised and not at all a complete soft touch for terrorist scum. I think you'll find scum like him have NO human rights, and by paying for all the stuff you mention, just proved that Britain is a set of tw$$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Irony well done is always a pleasure to see. That supposing some people recognise it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampster Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I think this is all a political ruse to get the masses onside for a blessing to withdraw from the auspices of the European Human Rights Act.. Keep this debacle fresh in the minds, make it look like a comedy of errors and that the Human Rights Acts is evil... Hey presto mass frothing at the mouth, withdrawal of the UK from the European Human Rights Act to widespread hoorah's & huzzah's All while this has basically had begger all to do with the ECHR, and the Goverment get's even more free reign to crush the plebs into subservience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I know this may be a radical suggestion but if he's done something wrong can't he be tried in a British court? OK it's not as cheap as sending him abroad but at least it would be within the law. Failing that can't the US demand his extradition on trumped up hacking charges? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quisquose Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Of course he should. If he wasn't here then as a known international terrorist his "human rights" might be violated. The greatest test of a civilized country is how we treat out most deadly enemies and in order to ensure the horrors of WW2 could not happen again we introduced the EDHR just after we'd hung all the nazis. By paying for his house, his wives, his many spawn and his legal fees we prove Britain is civilised and not at all a complete soft touch for terrorist scum. Quite the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on SF. ---------- Post added 27-03-2013 at 21:09 ---------- That supposing some people recognise it. Oh ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boothybabe Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Of course he should. If he wasn't here then as a known international terrorist his "human rights" might be violated. The greatest test of a civilized country is how we treat out most deadly enemies and in order to ensure the horrors of WW2 could not happen again we introduced the EDHR just after we'd hung all the nazis. By paying for his house, his wives, his many spawn and his legal fees we prove Britain is civilised and not at all a complete soft touch for terrorist scum. Well said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forum41 Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Just get an RAF plane, boot his backside all the way up the steps onto it, fly to Jordan, boot him back down the steps. Fly home. Exactly what are "European Court of Human Rights (of Every Evil Loser on the Planet)" going to do about it? Yes, but why not just save on the aviation fuel cost... If they'd have discretely stuck a bullet in the back of the vermin's head in the first place, all of this farce and expense would have been unnecessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quisquose Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I fully support the idea that we should pay for his house, his wives, and his kids ... as long as it's next door to a pork pie factory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.