Halibut Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 and in fact dnt u think its a bit hypocritical, preaching about global warming on a computer which uses energy generated by coal fired power stations? a) I'm not preaching b) How do you know where my energy comes from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rip_dime Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 i dnt see no wind turbines in hillsborough. and unless uve got a reactor in ur garage ur using the national grid, power from this area comes from coal fired stations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 i dnt see no wind turbines in hillsborough. and unless uve got a reactor in ur garage ur using the national grid, power from this area comes from coal fired stations What of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox20thc Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 i dnt see no wind turbines in hillsborough. and unless uve got a reactor in ur garage ur using the national grid, power from this area comes from coal fired stations Have you not heard of green energy suppliers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dozey Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 One major volcanic eruption can affect the worlds weather how will you stop that happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordChaverly Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 Climate change has become the latest cause celebre of the hectoring classes (and how they love to hector). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BasilRathbon Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 Climate change has become the latest cause celebre of the hectoring classes (and how they love to hector). Indeed. Climate change exists, but then it always has. That's the point of the climate - it changes continually and would continue to do so even if mankind were wiped from the planet. When you see one of these hysterical documentaries about how we're all going to die 'cause of global warming, listen carefully to the verb used; you'll find that the 'experts' are describing what "could" happen, rather than what "will" happen. Because sensationalism sells more than boring facts, the predictions will be wildly distorted. I saw one recently where the global warming obsessives had roped in a clearly-confused David Attenborough to give creedence to their wild predictions. In our lifetimes, chances are the only effects of climate change will be an almost-imperceptable increase in average temperature of about a degree or so. As for what happens to your children or grandchildren, if it worries you that much, don't have kids! If the world wasn't so overpopulated we wouldn't need to burn so much fuel! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 In our lifetimes, chances are the only effects of climate change will be an almost-imperceptable increase in average temperature of about a degree or so. As for what happens to your children or grandchildren, if it worries you that much, don't have kids! If the world wasn't so overpopulated we wouldn't need to burn so much fuel! Ah, but I'd have to take issue with your 'almost - imperceptible' increase in average temperature - the changes in our climate are clearly noticeable now. The seasons are much less well - defined than they were and winter has become a total non-event. I had roses in bloom a couple of weeks ago. That certainly didn't happen in January when I was a child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rip_dime Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 sorry just returned from giving the car a thrash as "we re all going to die" thort i best do it while ive still got the chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purdyamos Posted February 9, 2007 Share Posted February 9, 2007 I saw one recently where the global warming obsessives had roped in a clearly-confused David Attenborough to give creedence to their wild predictions. Actually, Basil, you couldn't be more wrong. Far from being 'clearly-confused', David Attenborough has resisted joining in the debate on climate change for years, refusing to comment until the weight of evidence became overwhelming and pretty much irrefutable. The fact that he finally chose to use his authority and reputation to add his voice to the cause is in fact the very opposite of 'sensationalism'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now