Jump to content

The Global Warming Megathread


Do you believe human inflicted climate change is real?  

113 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you believe human inflicted climate change is real?

    • Absolutely, unequivocally.
      57
    • Maybe, i need more evidence
      20
    • Not at all, it's all made up!
      35
    • Whats global warming?
      1


Recommended Posts

No, the populus [actually only 6 thousand million, and not 7 million million] do not contribute to climate change.

Natural causes do.

[actually only 6 thousand million, and not 7 million million]

:huh:

 

What makes you think that human activity of unlocking the earths stored CO2 and releasing it into the atmosphere, deforestation, air and oceanic pollution, urbanization, and increased water vapour don’t contribute to climate change?

Edited by MrSmith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the book "Watermelons" by James Delingpole, or see his website http://jamesdelingpole.com/

Then you'll know why you're wrong.

 

You are assuming that James Delingpole is right, when in fact he must be wrong, if reading his book has lead you to the incorrect conclusion that the human activity of unlocking the earth’s stored CO2 and releasing it into the atmosphere, deforestation, air and oceanic pollution, urbanization, and increased water vapour hasn’t contribute to climate change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sibon
Read the book "Watermelons" by James Delingpole, or see his website http://jamesdelingpole.com/

Then you'll know why you're wrong.

 

Watch this

failing to answer a simple question.

 

Then you will know why he is very likely to be wrong.

 

His understanding of science and of the naturre of science is flawed to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sibon
I like the "must be wrong" and "is very likely to be wrong" in posts #593 and #594 respectively. Neither member knows for sure, of course, so the 'precautionary principle' that their views embrace ought to oblige them to accept his views!

 

Not really. In this case, it is impossible to be 100% certain, but the evidence certainly points to Dellingpole being wrong. Maybe, the two contributors understand more about uncertainty than you.

 

In any case, you did very well to watch a five minute vid clip and write a comment about it in less than four minutes. Does Dellingpole have anything to say about the non-linear nature of time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.