Strix Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Hang on a tick - that article claims that the treasury will be quids in with this one Isn't this going to turn out like the bank charges fiasco, where they're only entitled to charge an admin fee which actually reflects the costs involved, not a profit scheme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotPhil Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Have you seen government admin? It probably "costs" ten times the fee they're charging to send replacement licences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deepcarowl Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 I'm registered diabetic so my licence has to be renewed every three years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DT Ralge Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 The photocard element of licences started to expire last month having been around for ten years. There will undoubtedly be people around who have moved, not informed the DVLA, not got the reminder (I s'pose they will remind us) so have an expired, therefore, invalid licence and presumably no valid insurance. Both parts of a licence have to be current to be valid. There are provisions, I believe, in the Road Safety Act of 2006 that, when implemented, will force/foist 2-part photocard licences on those who still have the old-style paper licences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nodens Posted September 11, 2008 Author Share Posted September 11, 2008 My license was issued in 1976 and it states that it is valid until 2018, so the government and the EU can go forth and multiply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nodens Posted September 11, 2008 Author Share Posted September 11, 2008 amazing - learning something useful from the DM! Of course it could be all fascist and racist propaganda, better check the BBC or the Guardian for a true and balanced report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DT Ralge Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 My license was issued in 1976 and it states that it is valid until 2018, so the government and the EU can go forth and multiply. Look at section 4b on the front of the photocard (just above the smaller of the two photos), if you have one, and you will see the expiry date of the card. On the back of the photocard you have your vehicle category entitlements. The expiry dates of those are mostly the same as your paper counterpart i.e. the day before your 70th birthday unless you have taken, say, HGV tests that have to be renewed at earlier dates - 45th bithday (with associated medicals) or have a notified medical condition (diabetes etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmist Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Ahh good another fuss over nothing from the papers. Of course the photocards have to be renewed every so often, otherwise it would be pretty pointless having a photo on them, being as how it would cease to resemble the holder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
md25 Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Hang on a tick - that article claims that the treasury will be quids in with this one Isn't this going to turn out like the bank charges fiasco, where they're only entitled to charge an admin fee which actually reflects the costs involved, not a profit scheme Alarmingly the government isn't regulated by the FSA so there isn't any principle of fairness. They are, theoretically, watched over by the National Audit Office, which is supine enough not to matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex C. Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Alarmingly the government isn't regulated by the FSA so there isn't any principle of fairness. They are, theoretically, watched over by the National Audit Office, which is supine enough not to matter. Well the bank charges thing isn't too much to do with the FSA, it's more to do with contract law, particularly the unfair contract terms parts of it. This on the other hand is created via legislation, so is presumably not covered under contract law since no contract exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.