Solomon1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 none of th stuff he posted in a long time has been anything but valid comment, said calmy based on fact. i'd have to disagree bobcat. 75% of what he has posted recently has just been designed to hurt people. i don't like the guy but i have an open mind, and if he turns over a new leaf and shows us his nicer side ...i'm more than willing to change my mind about him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk014b7161 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 a troll to some a hero to others it cuts both ways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 All too easy for you to knock them when they cant talk back, saying little egos and inane drivel but none of th stuff he posted in a long time has been anything but valid comment, said calmy based on fact. doesnt stop you from deleting it off thn saying it was inane drivel though does it when he cant argue back? There are forum rules which relate to people not being allowed more than one user id. If people transgress these rules then they lose the right to post. It's the same on all fora, they're private enterprises and the rules are promulgated by the owner and posters agree to abide by them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 I absolutely agree, I am sorry if I upset anyone but I honestly thought that Bartfast was an arrogant, and nasty person, an opinion is one thing but nastiness is another...I neither respect nor miss him! When he first came on SF I thought he was trolling, over time I think that he has now morphed into a Walter Mitty character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*bobcat* Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 i'd have to disagree bobcat. 75% of what he has posted recently has just been designed to hurt people. i don't like the guy Intersting, cause he doesnt like or dislike people based on what they post. i'd be intersted to know what 75% you read that was designed to hurt people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 a troll to some a hero to others it cuts both ways i understand you admire someone who is direct and honest about subject matter pk, i do too. but i don't admire someone who just hurts people because they can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solomon1 Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 Intersting, cause he doesnt like or dislike people based on what they post. i'd be intersted to know what 75% you read that was designed to hurt people the posts have been deleted because of their nature bob.... incidentally....are you married to him???? seem to remember reading a post saying something along the lines of 'because of who i'm married to' and coupled with your current stance.... do you know him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*bobcat* Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 There are forum rules which relate to people not being allowed more than one user id. If people transgress these rules then they lose the right to post. It's the same on all fora, they're private enterprises and the rules are promulgated by the owner and posters agree to abide by them.Not disputing that for a minute max, not saying bans arent due for that, just think its a bit off for a mod to be saying 'little egos' and inane drivel we both know he posted many good points and was mostly far from drivel. we also both know he reved people up but wasn't the first one to sling insults Fine to say hes not allowedto post and will always be banned, bit off for a mod to distort things, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 The little ego and inane drivel wasn't directed at any particular ex-member but if the cap fits, as the saying goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DT Ralge Posted November 9, 2008 Share Posted November 9, 2008 I'm wondering whether a really stupid poster/debater on here could actually hide behind the label "troll" - i.e his/her posts argue, indefensibly, that black is white and when shown up to be entirely foolish then move to argue against his/her own points - all in a few moments - and then retire labelled as a TROLL (rather than as a FOOL) thinking this is debate rather than a perverse desire to pick an argument. Someone else on an earlier post on this same topic called it ....-stirring. Very apt. Would TROLLS last five minutes in a face-to-face bar-room debate, though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.