bizzle Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Still no excuse for violence though is it. No it is not but you could argue she is responding back in self defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spyro Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 You both lashed out in anger. He hurt you mentally, you hurt him physically. Both can be bad. He needs to realise that he is with someone who can't take being called names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natalie H Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 I never suggested you didnt. Ok. I am not taking over someone elses thread by arguing back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Watcher Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Ok. I am not taking over someone elses thread by arguing back. I didnt think we were arguing:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Watcher Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 No it is not but you could argue she is responding back in self defence. It would be a very, very week argument though wouldnt it. And one that possibly wouldnt stand up well in a court of law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizzle Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 It wouls be a very, very week argument though wouldnt it. And one that possibly would stand up well in a court of law. Not really as the OP has said this is not the first time he has called her a slag. What he is doing to her you could class a mental abuse? & there is only so much a person can take before they retaleate back. Why call her a slag in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salster! Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 It wouls be a very, very week argument though wouldnt it. And one that possibly wouldnt stand up well in a court of law. And if it was a bloke that had hit a woman the replies on this thread would be very, very different.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Watcher Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 Not really as the OP has said this is not the first time he has called her a slag. What he is doing to her you could class a mental abuse? & there is only so much a person can take before the retaleate back. Why call her a slag in the first place? Maybe she is a slag (im not for one second saying she is by the way) or maybe she is winding him up in other ways she hasent told us yet. Regardless there isnt an excuse for violence in a relationship. If he makes her that angry then they have no place being a couple. It will only end in tears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Watcher Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 And if it was a bloke that had hit a woman the replies on this thread would be very, very different.... I agree totaly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gripper Stebson Posted January 15, 2009 Share Posted January 15, 2009 No it is not but you could argue she is responding back in self defence. If he had hit her back would that be classed as self defence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.