Halibut Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Well I dont really see the point, I will be criticised and laughed at for whatever I post. I know how I feel about the issue and am sure time will prove me right, of that I am sure. Well, you could try posting something remotely credible, that'd sort out the criticism/laughter angle fairly neatly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 I will be criticised and laughed at for whatever I post. Let's be constructive then. Do you see why we question the credibility of Jim Marrs and Dr / Bishop Bowman? Do you see why that poll is more than a little questionable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartfarst Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 As sensible as ever, Ken. Venger - and I mean this in the nicest possible way - you're a fruitcake. Halibut, I shall record this in my diary as, I think, the third time I have agreed with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Halibut, I shall record this in my diary as, I think, the third time I have agreed with you. Hell's teeth! What were the other two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Most of it burned off on impact. No it did not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarSparkle Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Well I dont really see the point, I will be criticised and laughed at for whatever I post. I know how I feel about the issue and am sure time will prove me right, of that I am sure. Don't let the b******* grind you down, Venger. Stick to your guns. I don't pretend to have any idea what the truth regarding 9/11 is, but the world needs brave people like yourself to be asking tough questions where there are incongruities and holes in the official line. Nobody with an ounce of intelligence in this day and age should be swallowing what the powers-that-be tell us, without questioning it. We've been lied to too many times. A dose of healthy scepticism is good for everyone. StarSparkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 A dose of healthy scepticism is good for everyone. Not when it contravenes the laws of physics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarSparkle Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Not when it contravenes the laws of physics. I don't believe ALL the inconsistencies around 9/11 involve contravening the laws of physics.... StarSparkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Fair enough if that's your opinion. I haven't found a single 'theory' that stands up to any scrutiny. 'Gut feelings' don't do it for me. I prefer to go with the old fashioned ideas like Newtonian Physics instead of theories proposed by people who try to get yogic flyers elected to the US Presidency or who believe in connection between worldwide power cabals and pyramids. I guess that I'm funny that way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarSparkle Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Fair enough if that's your opinion. I haven't found a single 'theory' that stands up to any scrutiny. 'Gut feelings' don't do it for me. I prefer to go with the old fashioned ideas like Newtonian Physics instead of theories proposed by people who try to get yogic flyers elected to the US Presidency or who believe in connection between worldwide power cabals and pyramids. I guess that I'm funny that way Like I said, I have absolutely no idea what the truth behind 9/11 is. The official line may be the whole truth, or it may be a pack of lies. I simply don't know, but I am keeping an open mind either way. But there are genuine people asking genuine questions about genuine inconsistencies, and I don't think it's appropriate that you should try and tar them all with the same 'fruitcake' brush. No doubt some of the 'alternative investigators' have a shaky grip on reality, but not everyone who has concerns about what we are being told about 9/11 is the sort of person who believes in 'pyramidology' and the like. To ridicule questioning minds is to try to stifle debate, and surely that's not what's wanted in a democracy? Is it? StarSparkle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.