4U2NV Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 C+P from another website re: the controlled demolition theory - woudn't there have needed to be a time when 'they' (the Bilderberg Kennedy UFO secret agents) painstakingly drilled several hundred plugs into the building, packed them with explosives, wired them all up (hiding the wires from windowcleaners and the like obnov), phoned up some arab friends who'd just finished flying school, explained the 'big idea', sat waiting for planes to hit from a hiding place nearby, and finally pressed the button shortly afterwards? I've heard of project management, but.. stranger things have happened like not winning the election and still getting into office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 It happens to be on motion picture, so I think that means it is quite true. That's not evidence - that's opinion This might help. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Larry_Silverstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
venger Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 That's not evidence - that's opinion This might help. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Larry_Silverstein Sure, that cannot be proven. This can: 'The specifics of the fires in WTC-7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time' FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study CH.5, Sect 6.2 FEMA ~ (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Agency of the US government tasked with Disaster Mitigation, Preparedness, Response & Recovery planning.) So did fire bring down building 7, because it certainly was not an aeroplane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I dunno, but I do know that a lack of a proper conclusion for whatever reason doesn't mean that we should invent one Larry Silverstein seems to be quite clear about what he said and what he meant, and it makes perfect sense. I have no reason to disbelieve him and there's no reason to put words into his mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniperwookie Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 The site might have it's own agenda, but they don't make this stuff up you know. No, I don't know. Can you point me to somewhere on their website which shows they have any real credibility? Some proof they know what they are talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4U2NV Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 New in... http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/220306gossiprag.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 You just lost all your points by mentioning an article with "Alex Jones" in it. He makes David Icke look lucid on occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniperwookie Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 I would have to say I'm more inclined to believe somebody like Popular Mechanics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 "Alex Jones interviews Charlie Sheen" Here's a big up to the conspiracy mob ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carcrash Posted March 23, 2006 Share Posted March 23, 2006 Isn't Charlie Sheen's dad the President in The West Wing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.