Tony Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 To be honest, all this silly conspiracy talk is a bit redundant when there are terrorists admitting to being part of the plot, and that Bin Laden was behind it all. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4850988.stm Or have they been given mind altering drugs as part of the conspiracy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macca Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 To be honest, all this silly conspiracy talk is a bit redundant when there are terrorists admitting to being part of the plot, and that Bin Laden was behind it all. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4850988.stm Or have they been given mind altering drugs as part of the conspiracy This guys changed his story a few times though, hasn't he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniB Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Ooh yes, Moussaoui and old Richard 'Smokin' Shoes' Reid – a powerful force – who could ever doubt that such masterminds were behind highjacking 4 planes and single-handedly flying them with pin point accuracy into key buildings in the US over the course of an hour or so – all controlled by Bin Laden from his bat cave!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnbradley Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 To be honest, all this silly conspiracy talk is a bit redundant when there are terrorists admitting to being part of the plot, and that Bin Laden was behind it all. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4850988.stm Or have they been given mind altering drugs as part of the conspiracy lol, tony there's no hope really, is there? can you reconcile the fema report that there was no firefighting going on in wt7 before the building 'collapsed', and silverstein's comments? as for the latest news, there are many possibilities involving/not involving the bin-man and his pals, i wouldnt place too much emphasis on that geezer's words...perhaps it'll benefit him to start implicating others...cant be that satisfying to only have one bloke held over the biggest terrorist attack in american history... but i couldnt really say for sure, neither can you:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4U2NV Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Ooh yes, Moussaoui and old Richard 'Smokin' Shoes' Reid – a powerful force – who could ever doubt that such masterminds were behind highjacking 4 planes and single-handedly flying them with pin point accuracy into key buildings in the US over the course of an hour or so – all controlled by Bin Laden from his bat cave!! i like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 and to those who dont believe the term 'to pull itl' refers to a demo job check this, in the same documentary as the one silverstein says the above, a worker involved in the operation talks about getting ready to 'pull building 6.' Cripes, how many times do we have to repeat this. Everyone there has confirmed that they were talking about pulling out the firefighters. This idea that it refers to demolition has only come from 'theorists' The people that were really there have always said different! Heck, there isn't even such a term in demolition - it's an invention!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtticusFinch Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 To be honest, all this silly conspiracy talk is a bit redundant when there are terrorists admitting to being part of the plot, and that Bin Laden was behind it all. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4850988.stm Or have they been given mind altering drugs as part of the conspiracy But (again hypothetically) isn't it in their interests to claim they did it, even if they didn't? Surely any hardcore Al-Qaida member would love to be associated with such an event, even if it actually had nothing to do with them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnbradley Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 tony, the fema report apparently found there were no firefighters in wt7. please explain silversteins comments to me, in light of this. cheers mate:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdul Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 But (again hypothetically) isn't it in their interests to claim they did it, even if they didn't? Surely any hardcore Al-Qaida member would love to be associated with such an event, even if it actually had nothing to do with them? Has Bin Laden ever admitted responsibility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Does he ever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.