Lady Star Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 If you don’t know who the Marxist loony was who led the miners then you obviously know less about the whole affair then you claim I didn't realise you had been talking about mining - you hadn't been having that discussion with me... Roll yourself ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berberis Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 I didn't realise you had been talking about mining - you hadn't been having that discussion with me... Roll yourself ! Hmm ... in that case it would appear I know more about what you are talking about than you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Star Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Hmm ... in that case it would appear I know more about what you are talking about than you Ok let me take this slowly, so you can grasp what I am saying - you responded to a post from me regarding the state of state schools in the 1980's - You then made a left field comment re marxists in a post where you replied to me - We hadn't been talking mining, we'd been talking schools, and we didn't go to school in mines in the 1980's you know - honestly! Admit you confused posts when you replied to me and let's move on, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanic99 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Ok let me take this slowly, so you can grasp what I am saying - you responded to a post from me regarding the state of state schools in the 1980's - You then made a left field comment re marxists in a post where you replied to me - We hadn't been talking mining, we'd been talking schools, and we didn't go to school in mines in the 1980's you know - honestly! Admit you confused posts when you replied to me and let's move on, eh? this is what Serapis does, he tries to move the thread off track so that the important issues aren't discussed. Ask him how the ridiculous policy that means we'll all be working a year longer now is going to help the unemployed looking for jobs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Star Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 this is what Serapis does, he tries to move the thread off track so that the important issues aren't discussed. Ask him how the ridiculous policy that means we'll all be working a year longer now is going to help the unemployed looking for jobs! Bless - I just thought he was a bit simple! That said, promoting the garbled messages re what a tory policy might look like probably means that the poor thing is delusional... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandad.Malky Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 "If the Conservatives win the election how high will unemployment rise? " Who knows but the number of people dying before they get their state pension will, 68 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloudybay Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 "If the Conservatives win the election how high will unemployment rise? " Who knows but the number of people dying before they get their state pension will, 68 years old. A policy already put in place by Nu Labour back in 2006. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/state-pension-age-to-rise-to-68-479679.html And regardless as to what government of what political persuassion we vote for,it will rise further http://www.citywire.co.uk/personal/-/news/money-property-and-tax/content.aspx?ID=347978 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandad.Malky Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 A policy already put in place by Nu Labour back in 2006. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/state-pension-age-to-rise-to-68-479679.html And regardless as to what government of what political persuassion we vote for,it will rise further http://www.citywire.co.uk/personal/-/news/money-property-and-tax/content.aspx?ID=347978 A policy which the Tories want to bring forward and take the opportunity to blame labour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloudybay Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 A policy which the Tories want to bring forward and take the opportunity to blame labour. Both parties are equally culpable. Neither has had the guts to get a real handle on the spiraling cost of welfare over the past few decades. Until contributions to a private pension scheme are made mandatory, disability benefits are only paid to the totally disabled and other benefits are time-bound, nothing will change. In essence, the working populace will have to work until they drop to pay for the feckless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titanic99 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 A policy already put in place by Nu Labour back in 2006. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/state-pension-age-to-rise-to-68-479679.html And regardless as to what government of what political persuassion we vote for,it will rise further http://www.citywire.co.uk/personal/-/news/money-property-and-tax/content.aspx?ID=347978 Why does it have to rise? Again at the risk of repeating myself but no-one has answered my point. The state penions is £96 per week, to keep someone unemployed is more than that and by keeping us on for another year then you are keeping people unemployed for another year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.