jjrobbins Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 Question to you ALL ... If we as a country were going to war, who would you support? There are some of us who stand for everything British, that all that is encompassed by the sovreignty. There are others, while considering themselves to be British, will fight for the cause of their own beliefs. If a 3rd world war / holy war (gihad) were to break out, I would fight for MY country and what I believe in, but what has our country come to now? Going back to the 1st / 2nd world war, our families fought for their country, but if the same people were alive today would they feel that they fought to represent our nation as what it stood during those times, or as the nation that we protray ourselves to be today? We as a great 1st world nation, embrace the diverse cultures that we come to recognise as part of our society, however when push comes to shove, would those foreign nations that have sought refuge within our country stand to fight for the COUNTRY or would they be inclined to fight for the beliefs of their ancestors? (i.e. their culture/heritage/religion) It is my opinion that while those of asian dissent are happy to consider themselves as british nationals, they will fight for their rights, but does that incorporate OUR country and culture??? I would be interested to hear from those of you who hold an opinion towards this argument...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 Why are you picking on asians? They already play cricket for our country why would war be any different? If that holy war were being fought by a christian faith, eg Bush's forces in Iraq, would you still consider it your duty to fight? I don't think any right minded person can answer your questions as there are insufficient facts upon which to base a decision. Or are you asking people to say 'my country right or wrong'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 I call a spade an ablative kintetic geomorphological modification instrument as it happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 It's a very interesting question JJ has set. 100 years ago there wasn't as much cross-culturalism as there is now and migration was not as simple as today. Most people in a country were most probably born and raised there, with all their ancestry and roots going back generations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back2basics Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 Yeah it's a very interesting question. When i was in the states i would from time to time meet Indian guys who were SO PROUD to hold an British passport. Look at how Australia is still holding on to severity. Hong Kong is another ex-colony where the people have a huge amount of respect for England. I am sure there are people who would not fight. But i would say many would be only too happy. Also (and i hesitate before saying this), most people who are in the army do it for a job, not as some form of nationalistic pride to protect their country. Nobody expects to fight if you are in the army, you may get called up and if you do you MUST fight or be kicked out. So another interesting question would be, if you were allowed to not fight without dishonour, how many English born people would also back out. As a nation we are so good at knocking ourselves, we often forget what an amazing country we live in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chalicefc3 Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 I TOTALLY agree with what jjrobbins has written - i think if we are mostly honest, how many of us have sat down in a pub with a mate and discussed this VERY topic :-)) at least he has got the balls to stand up and say what he thinks, whereas many other people wouldnt have done so. jjrobbins has taken the words as if right out of my mouth - i think that we should take a stand for what we believe in. However, i dont think that many people give a damn about our country anymore - its a case of grab what you can get financially in life and then depatriotise yourselves by moving to another country. Can't say i blame them, you pay 40% death tax to a government that cant even invest that money into a sound transportation/health infrastructure. I might consider taking up a course in arabic - it might come in useful if i stick around in the future!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted October 3, 2003 Share Posted October 3, 2003 Nationality is, ultimately, bull****. These hypothetical wars, are in all likelihood, to be fought in the national interest. Why else fight a war? Remove nation states from that equation and your hypothetical war are in the interests of whom? No-one. Nationality is a prison not a fortress. There is no such thing as a bad peace There is no such thing as a good war. -Benjamin Franklin (i believe) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max Posted October 3, 2003 Share Posted October 3, 2003 With you on that one Phanny, or as Dr Johnson so eloquently put it "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel". I've lived on 3 continents and have family who have settled all around the world. The thrust of this thread seems to be that I should be willing to go to war against friends and relatives under any circumstances. I'd find that difficult, to say the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBouncer Posted October 3, 2003 Share Posted October 3, 2003 Originally posted by Phanerothyme Nationality is, ultimately, bull****. These hypothetical wars, are in all likelihood, to be fought in the national interest. Why else fight a war? Remove nation states from that equation and your hypothetical war are in the interests of whom? No-one. Nationality is a prison not a fortress. There is no such thing as a bad peace There is no such thing as a good war. -Benjamin Franklin (i believe) Theoretically.... then Phan. If Sweden became a super power and decided to invade the UK with thoughts of taking over the country. Would you fight to stop them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted October 3, 2003 Share Posted October 3, 2003 No - you would find me rounded up in a camp with all the other pacifists, conscientious objectors, quakers et al who refused to fight, or as a refugee on my way to a better life in Albania. As for Sweden becoming a superpower, well, it's a nice idea, but the sun set on the Swedish Empire 700 years ago when it included all of scandinavia, northern europe and a great swathe of Russia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.