danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Then why are you on this thread? Because i'm here to express my views, why are you here?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 EXACTLY!!, the younger they look the better, is that what you're saying?? No, that clearly isn't what I was saying. Halibut, Turning 16 makes all the difference. How does it? Is it just because there's a law that says so? A paedophile would not be interrested in a 19 year old that looks 15.. would you agree?? I would agree, but fail to see the point you're attempting to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Their just numbers for gods sake...answer the question. If it's legal at any certain age is it morally wrong a day befor they reach that age? Do you see morality and legislation as the same? Will you please answer the question? as you keep asking others to do. Of course its morally wrong the day before they turn 16, what kind of a question is that?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amaranthus Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Epiph, I can understand your thought process but imagine you had a young daughter/ son and someone you knew was having sexual thoughts about them... they'd never act on them but still wouldn't it disgust you that someone wag picturing getting sexual with your child? In answer to the porn/ school girl question, there are girls who go to school and wear a uniform but they have reached the age of puberty and have developed the body of a woman so I don't think that fantasy is directly related to paedophillia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Because i'm here to express my views, why are you here?? To debate. You can express you view in one sentence.."I'm as simplistic as the op suggests". end of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 What a shame that you're not prepared to even think about things from anything other than a rigid and inflexible point of view. Think about what??.. please tell me which type of paedophiles I shold allow in my house with my kids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 No, that clearly isn't what I was saying. How does it? Is it just because there's a law that says so? I would agree, but fail to see the point you're attempting to make. How can you agree if you don't see my point:huh: It would'nt matter whether the child was 16 years and 1 minute or 16 years and 364 days.. it would'nt matter how old they are as long as they are of consenting age in the eyes of the law, which is what paedophiles turn their nose up at because they liks them uner age. What am I missing here??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 To debate. You can express you view in one sentence.."I'm as simplistic as the op suggests". end of? I'm not you, neither am I the OP. So I'll decide how I express my views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Epiph, I can understand your thought process but imagine you had a young daughter/ son and someone you knew was having sexual thoughts about them... they'd never act on them but still wouldn't it disgust you that someone wag picturing getting sexual with your child? In answer to the porn/ school girl question, there are girls who go to school and wear a uniform but they have reached the age of puberty and have developed the body of a woman so I don't think that fantasy is directly related to paedophillia. But that's the whole point shaz..If you tell me your thoughts then the thought becomes an action. Once it becomes an action you have every right to fear or protect your child. Without the action of someone telling you their thoughts how do you know what their thinking and why should there be worry? Otherwise we'd be worrying about the thoughts of everyone...wouldn't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 How can you agree if you don't see my point:huh: It would'nt matter whether the child was 16 years and 1 minute or 16 years and 364 days.. it would'nt matter how old they are as long as they are of consenting age in the eyes of the law, which is what paedophiles turn their nose up at because they liks them uner age. What am I missing here??? Nearly everything I'm afraid; you seem utterly unable to think in anything other than in concrete terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.