danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Read from post 184 (the one where I quoted you saying "we're discussing people that desire to have sex with a consenting child."). I then mentioned that a child can not consent until 16. You then asked: "What is the legal age then??.. because thats news to me!! " Which clearly implies you do not know the age of consent. paedophiles usually groom the kids that they abuse because they know them, alot of kids are taken in by their lies. Are you suggesting that every child that they abuse are 16, and the younger ones are all toddlers?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Are you suggesting that every child that they abuse are 16, and the younger ones are all toddlers?? Obviously not. What I am saying (not suggesting at all) is that you fail to recognise the fact that under 16s can not give consent, which you clearly state in this post. You're still failing to see you own factually inaccurate post which lead to me posting (for your benefit as you didn't seem to understand your own words) a quote from wikipedia explaining the age of consent in England. <Simple Mode> "sex with a consenting child." See the bold bit above??? You're implying that a child can give consent. Something forbidden in law. Therefore, no consent can be given by a child (as you are saying when you said "a consenting child"). </Simple Mode> See? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Obviously not. What I am saying (not suggesting at all) is that you fail to recognise the fact that under 16s can not give consent, which you clearly state in this post. You're still failing to see you own factually inaccurate post which lead to me posting (for your benefit as you didn't seem to understand your own words) a quote from wikipedia explaining the age of consent in England. <Simple Mode> "sex with a consenting child." See the bold bit above??? You're implying that a child can give consent. Something forbidden in law. Therefore, no consent can be given by a child (as you are saying when you said "a consenting child"). </Simple Mode> See? Oh dear!!.. Ok, i'll rephrase it. They would like a child to willingly agree to have sex with them.. is that factually correct enough for you?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splodgeyAl Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Oh dear!!.. Ok, i'll rephrase it. They would like a child to willingly agree to have sex with them.. is that factually correct enough for you?? Not really, it's still your beliefs about the thoughts of an entire group of people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Not really, it's still your beliefs about the thoughts of an entire group of people Wheres the evidence to prove that some paedophiles never abuse?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splodgeyAl Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Wheres the evidence to prove that some paedophiles never abuse?? As has been said many times - if they've only thought about it, for one. But more to the point, that wasn't my point, which was how do you know that they want a child to consent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Not really, it's still your beliefs about the thoughts of an entire group of people And secondly, thats what iv'e been doing.. addressing my concern over the thoughts of an entire group of people... have you not guessed who they are yet?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splodgeyAl Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 And secondly, thats what iv'e been doing.. addressing my concern over the thoughts of an entire group of people... have you not guessed who they are yet?? No, I haven't *guessed* who they are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 As has been said many times - if they've only thought about it, for one. But more to the point, that wasn't my point, which was how do you know that they want a child to consent? Of course they do otherwise they would'nt bother grooming them?? Like iv'e already said, their sexual behaviour can't be looked at like everyone else's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splodgeyAl Posted February 19, 2010 Share Posted February 19, 2010 Of course they do otherwise they would'nt bother grooming them?? Like iv'e already said, their sexual behaviour can't be looked at like everyone else's. Erm. Philip Garrido for one didn't bother grooming Jaycee Lee Dugard. Same with Fritzl. Ergo not every pedophile wants consensual sex with children. Can you feel the black and white mixing into grey yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.