BananaSplit Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 To my knowledge it's child porn sex offences. Thats not to say it mind you.. time will tell. How do you know that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Just because someone doesn't share your view, there is no need to be downright insulting. Insulting again? Are all social workers (substitute the "or" with "an" in the word workers for their true title) as nasty as you? Makes no wonder why they have such a poor reputation. Social worker? Where did you get that mistaken impression. As for the insults I suggest you read danots' posts and numerous replies from other posters then form an opinion as to whether he is an 'argumentative ****' and then have a good long look at the bold and ponder the irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Time certainly will tell. It may tell us he has actually done something wrong, or, alternatively, it may tell us he's done nothing wrong. until the evidence is tried, none of us know. ...And of course, until then V is still innocent. and even after that, he would only be guilty if the evidence is found proven. IF there is incriminating evidence against him.. there will be a trial, followed by a guilty verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 What do mean?.. you started the thread yer div.. Exactly and where did I mention 'evidence': Jack Straw has shed more light on the circumstances of Venables recall to jail and it now seems he will face a criminal trial for the offence/offences. Has the victim of his alleged offences been let down by the criminal justice system as if he hadn't been released he couldn't have committed the alleged act. LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 How do you know that? I don't for certain, just a figure of speach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaSplit Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 IF there is incriminating evidence against him.. there will be a trial, followed by a guilty verdict. How do you know that too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Exactly and where did I mention 'evidence': JACK STRAW REVEALS VENABLES ALLEGED SEX OFFENCES Who was it talking about getting suckered by an headline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 How do you know that too? If evidence proves someones guilt, they're usually found guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 JACK STRAW REVEALS VENABLES ALLEGED SEX OFFENCES Who was it talking about getting suckered by an headline. And again where does it state 'evidence'. Oh and about that ability to recognise when you are wrong. I did a good few pages ago. As the OP I admit I was misled by initial reports and my choice of thread title shows this. I am not so pig headed as to state I am never wrong. You are a bit special aren't you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Yes thats the one. Now would you be so kind as to provide the ealier posts of mine that have been out of all context, as that will corroberate the obove. Thanks Zaytsev! This is getting surreal: I didn't make any. You accused me of misquoting you. The only accusation I made was in responce to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.