danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Anyone can be incriminated in anything which is why the accused is given the chance to defend the charge. Hearing both the evidence and the defence is what a jury base their verdict on. I could plant stolen property in someones bag - the evidence would be incriminating for that person, but it would not ensure a guilty verdict by any means. What if they found level 4 child porn on your computer, what would be your defence?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Quite extraordinary. It's all gone totally hatstand. Quite. An Alice in Wonderland thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 What if they found level 4 child porn on your computer, what would be your defence?? What an extraordinary question to ask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BananaSplit Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 What if they found level 4 child porn on your computer, what would be your defence?? A very lame response to me showing you how incriminating evidence does not assume guilt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 IF there is incriminating evidence against him.. there will be a trial, followed by a guilty verdict. Again, no, no, no, no. And again, I will explain. (Are you really that hard of understanding? Is it deliberate?) IF the evidence (which MAY be incriminating) is tried and then PROVEN then the jury might bring back a guilty verdict. Just because the evidence is there, does not automatically mean he is guilty. or will be found guilty. The evidence has to be found proven to get a conviction. Do you understand that yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 What if they found level 4 child porn on your computer, what would be your defence?? What an extraordinary question to ask. A very lame response to me showing you how incriminating evidence does not assume guilt. totally, zayt! If they found something like that on my PC (god forbid there should be anything like that on mine) then my first question would be to ask how they could prove it was me who downloaded it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Again, no, no, no, no. And again, I will explain. (Are you really that hard of understanding? Is it deliberate?) No, not at all. IF the evidence (which MAY be incriminating) is tried and then PROVEN then the jury might bring back a guilty verdict. The charges are an extremely serious breach of his conditions, theres no MAY BE about it, I know that much. Therefore,if the evidence incriminates him, and is proven, why wouldn't he be found guilty?? Just because the evidence is there, does not automatically mean he is guilty. or will be found guilty. The evidence has to be found proven to get a conviction. Do you understand that yet? Of course I understand that, I haven't suggested anything to lead you to believe that I don't understand that simple fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 A very lame response to me showing you how incriminating evidence does not assume guilt. These are the alleged charges.. why is it lame?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 totally, zayt! If they found something like that on my PC (god forbid there should be anything like that on mine) then my first question would be to ask how they could prove it was me who downloaded it. Obviously!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 Jack Straw has shed more light on the circumstances of Venables recall to jail and it now seems he will face a criminal trial for the offence/offences. Has the victim of his alleged offences been let down by the criminal justice system as if he hadn't been released he couldn't have committed the alleged act. LINK What an extraordinary question to ask. You don't realise how funny you are! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.