Grahame Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 Perhaps, but only if they use 144 condoms? In one evening! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 Isn't sodomy a form of contraception? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 Isn't sodomy a form of contraception? God doesn't like it and I believe it is still illegal in this country. If it is man on man and you are over 18, I think god looks the other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 Isn't sodomy a form of contraception? So is doing what your signature says if you want to be disgusting. What a horrible (and illegal) thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jobee Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 There are many gods but only one God. How many more times are you going to tell us that. Talk sport, boxing,cricket, etcetera. This God thing became a mania with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purdyamos Posted May 1, 2010 Share Posted May 1, 2010 So is doing what your signature says if you want to be disgusting. What a horrible (and illegal) thought. I think you'll find that ignoring the word 'don't' in P's siggy makes your post look open to misinterpretation. In a 'though shalt commit adultery' kinda way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John1954 Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 So is doing what your signature says if you want to be disgusting. What a horrible (and illegal) thought. In light of your recent revelation that the bible is ambiguous when referring to the lord, it has now become necessary for you tell us when "lord" means your god or if it is referring to some imposter. We can no longer debate the biblical proclamations of the lord unless we know to which lord we are discussing. I understand this entails a lot of work for you but until it is completed we can't have meaningful debates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwhine Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 >snip< To answer your question it is only when the Jews were either following their own Jewish laws or their own false gods that it becomes "Of the Jews" otherwise the Old Testament is as much of Almighty God as the New Testament is. Apply that to christianity then. Turn the other cheek, and sell all your goods, give to the poor and go out and preach the gospel (for starters). Only when christians start following jeebus' instuctions ('laws') will the NT be for christians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwhine Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 Perhaps, but only if they use 144 condoms? That reminded me of the 'gross' joke; 'Why shouldn't you eat 288 earwigs?' 'Because that would be too gross.' ...and the condom joke; 'How many condoms can you make from a car tyre?' '365 if it's a Goodyear.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwhine Posted May 2, 2010 Share Posted May 2, 2010 So is doing what your signature says if you want to be disgusting. What a horrible (and illegal) thought. Sigh. Your lack of comprehension has reached a new high. Will you ever cease to amaze me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.