redwhine Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Being pro gay is being pro human rights. Being pro equality, and treating a fellow human with justice does not in any way contradict Jesus' (PBUH) teachings. What about his dad though? He is his dad. And his ghost. I know, I know. It's totally ridiculous, but I think they made it up so they can claim to be monotheists, although why anyone would want to do that is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Your signature is an insult You may feel insulted. If you do, then ask a moderator to look at it and decide. Your signature is an insult to atheists. But it isn't discrimination. discriminates against religion. How is that discrimination? It is simply an opinion (as is your sig - mine's a fact:hihi:). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rioja Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Your signature is an insult and discriminates against religion. Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll eat for life. Give a man religion and he'll starve praying for a fish! Atheism is a severe allergy to nuts. Don't be silly. His signature doesn't discriminate in any way. It simply opposes religion. Opposition to and discrimination against are two completely different things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwhine Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Is this still going? Has anyone actually put up any evidence that Xtians are being discriminated against yet? John X No. There's plenty that they're being discriminated for though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Opposition to and discrimination against are two completely different things. I've been trying to get him to see this basic premise for the last two days. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number Six Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Your signature is an insult and discriminates against religion. Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll eat for life. Give a man religion and he'll starve praying for a fish! Atheism is a severe allergy to nuts. Oh if only we could refer to a list of all your previous signatures! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Matt] Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Your signature is an insult and discriminates against religion. Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll eat for life. Give a man religion and he'll starve praying for a fish! Atheism is a severe allergy to nuts. LOL. And each and everyone of your signatures isn't deliberately inflammatory and not to mention a false assessment of religion and morality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwhine Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Not until someone started comparing genitalia and throats to religion and then using it to discriminate against religion. That is disgusting. http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showpost.php?p=6104763&postcount=744 I don't know who the 'someone' is to whom you refer, but it certainly isn't me. Please show where I suggested in that linked post that anybody should be allowed to wave their genitalia in public but that the religious should not. That would be discrimination. Look it up in a dictionary; saying all people should be treated equally won't be there, I assure you, whichever dictionary you choose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number Six Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 Does anyone else think this is getting a little silly - even by the Pythonesque standards of debates about religion on SF which involve Grahame? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 ;6108433']LOL. And each and everyone of your signatures isn't deliberately inflammatory and not to mention a false assessment of religion and morality? Are implying that Grahame is a bit of a hypocrite?:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.