truman Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 I didnt call you thick I asked how thick someone had to be to not understand that if someone has been cleared of something, then that, having been done, is then a fact. Because someone is cleared of something is not proof they didn't do it.....just the same as if someone is convicted of something doesn't mean they did do it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 if you find evidence to prove he was not acting in self-defence please pass it to the CPS as they have no seen anything of that nature The CPS decided there was sufficient evidence to charge him with assault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydotcom Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 Because someone is cleared of something is not proof they didn't do it.....just the same as if someone is convicted of something doesn't mean they did do it.. we have NO video evidence to prove he was NOT acting in self defence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 we have NO video evidence to prove he was NOT acting in self defence So what...? There's very little video evidence of murders but people still get convicted of them .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydotcom Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 The CPS decided there was sufficient evidence to charge him with assault. he has been cleared of common assault District Judge Daphne Wickham found no evidence had been provided to show use of the baton was not measured or correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydotcom Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 So what...? There's very little video evidence of murders but people still get convicted of them .. in this situation there is plenty of video evidence of the incident none of which can prove he was not acting in self-defence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozo Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 he has been cleared of common assault District Judge Daphne Wickham found no evidence had been provided to show use of the baton was not measured or correct I think we are all aware of that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthinus Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 if you find evidence to prove he was not acting in self-defence please pass it to the CPS as they have no seen anything of that natureWe have already been though this several times already and because a person shouts a cop, that does not give him valid reason to belt her around the legs. Tell you what, to keep it friendly, I say 'I beg to differ' and ignore any unreasonable comments from you in the future. How's that? Just like that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaJTTkpq50g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greybeard Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 The whole thing just leaves a bad smell. Looks like sergeant Smellie has caught a whiff of it too. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/apr/01/george-monbiot-police-trial-by-jury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted April 1, 2010 Share Posted April 1, 2010 in this situation there is plenty of video evidence of the incident none of which can prove he was not acting in self-defence Why do you think the CPS took this to court if there was no evidence of him doing anything wrong? Have you seen all of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.