Jump to content

A fabulous idea, why not leave the decisions to us


Recommended Posts

the head of a drinks company doesn't like taxes on drinking.

 

the same company that promotes alcopops to kids.

 

ok.

 

no, you're right... the really really greedy business intersts are too greedy to see their greed is what will let Gordy back in.

 

But I still say R. Murdoch represents far more accurately the vested interests, and is going to have more influence on the election than any number of British business people. And he's hopping mad at Tory Dave right now.

 

 

(edit - i half-expected the people who signed that letter to announce at 12pm it was an April Fool. because it was about as convincing)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

members of each community will look after their OWN community only - so Chelsea and Kensington will keep all their tax money to spend on doing up ... Chelsea and Kensington.

 

and Shiregreen will be allowed to spend their tax money on Shiregreen, but how do you reckon tax revenues in Shiregreen compare to Chelsea and Kensington?

 

So more money gets spent on Chelsea and Kensington, which is quite nice already. And less gets spent on less wealthy areas.

 

It's about dividing society.

 

Im pretty sure that wasn't what he was saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.