BritPat Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 The words "pot", "kettle" and "black" spring to mind. 3 small and insignificant words you are obviously something of an intellectual gymnast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 Is Nick Griffin gay? Not that this shoud matter in a modern tolerant society but rumour has it he is. Why? Are you declaring a personal interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gault Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 I've know Blunkett for many years and the one thing I can say assuredly about him is that he never tells the truth to the electorate, thats NEVER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeaFan Posted April 14, 2010 Author Share Posted April 14, 2010 I've know Blunkett for many years and the one thing I can say assuredly about him is that he never tells the truth to the electorate, thats NEVER. Same as everyone else then, BNP included. Don't vote. If you go into a shop and all they sell is crap, why buy something just for the sake of buying it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gault Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 Same as everyone else then, BNP included. Don't vote. If you go into a shop and all they sell is crap, why buy something just for the sake of buying it? Can't fault that, but what I can say is that the ousting of Blunlett by who ever would be a plus for democracy and quite frankly if it were a BNP candidate the repercussions would be emense and extreemly positive for the country and politics in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeaFan Posted April 14, 2010 Author Share Posted April 14, 2010 Can't fault that, but what I can say is that the ousting of Blunlett by who ever would be a plus for democracy and quite frankly if it were a BNP candidate the repercussions would be emense and extreemly positive for the country and politics in general. If Blunkett were ousted by someone opposed to democracy (except as a means to get themselves into power), how would that be a plus for democracy? Surely we don't have to bomb the village in order to save it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPat Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 If Blunkett were ousted by someone opposed to democracy (except as a means to get themselves into power), how would that be a plus for democracy? Surely we don't have to bomb the village in order to save it? An assertion on your part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garrence Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 An assertion on your part. Well done, BritPat! You can identify that people make assertions during a discussion! I see you've spotted a few on other threads as well! Clever you - you are learning! TeaFan's post was actually a question followed by a, possibly rhetorical, question - but you're nearly there. Other than learning to spot the difference between different types of sentence, an important part of learning to use a forum (and hold a civil conversation in general) is to contribute something of relevance to the discussion. Perhaps you'd be able to try really hard, resist the urge to write bizarre off-topic things or harangue people, and contribute something worthwhile? Do you actually have anything of interest to tell us about Mark Collett allegedly threatening to kill Nick Griffin? Would it have affected your vote if you lived in the constituency? How do you rationalise Nick Griffin's claims to lead a moderate and non-violent party with these death threat allegations, plus the significant number of party workers who have been tried for offenses such as assault, rape, paedophilia, bomb making, harrassment and export of torture equipment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 Well done, BritPat! You can identify that people make assertions during a discussion! I see you've spotted a few on other threads as well! Clever you - you are learning! TeaFan's post was actually a question followed by a, possibly rhetorical, question - but you're nearly there. Other than learning to spot the difference between different types of sentence, an important part of learning to use a forum (and hold a civil conversation in general) is to contribute something of relevance to the discussion. Perhaps you'd be able to try really hard, resist the urge to write bizarre off-topic things or harangue people, and contribute something worthwhile? Do you actually have anything of interest to tell us about Mark Collett allegedly threatening to kill Nick Griffin? Would it have affected your vote if you lived in the constituency? How do you rationalise Nick Griffin's claims to lead a moderate and non-violent party with these death threat allegations, plus the significant number of party workers who have been tried for offenses such as assault, rape, paedophilia, bomb making, harrassment and export of torture equipment? What and ignore all this lot from the other parties just so you can try and score cheap immature political points ? http://liarsbuggersandthieves.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streamline Posted April 14, 2010 Share Posted April 14, 2010 You seem to have something wrong with you. Do you suggest I should ignore the mass murders taking place and politicians stealing taxpayer's money, or do you think I will feel better when a couple of no- marks stop calling me racist or Nazi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.