sccsux Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 BNP - kills 99% of germs. I'd have thought it'd be more like "BNP - breeds more than 99% of all known germs":D I don't believe Blunkett has sued anyone for libel over this report - a different style of thuggishness but pretty scary nevertheless. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article602808.ece I'd not seen that:o:loopy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greybeard Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 ..apologises morty, although it's only slightly more nauseous than picturing the 'political' intercourse John Major & Edwina Currie used to engage in ...or David Blunkett and the publisher of The Spectator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jethete Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 ...or David Blunkett and the publisher of The Spectator He made be blind but I bet even Dave wouldn't touch Edwina! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 ...or David Blunkett and the publisher of The Spectator Blunkett, in the style of a true Sheffield pugilist was punching above his weight when he knocked up Kimberly Quinn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 If Collet wasn't BNP himself, you'd think threatening to kill Mr Griffin alone might be enough to get him elected. Anyway if he isn't standing anymore, hopefully they can make the ballot paper slightly smaller and save some trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gault Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 lol and not one apologist on the thread? In that case I'll give it a go. Quite frankly I'm very dissapointed at the so called enlightend ones around here jumping on the band wagon to condem everyone conected with the BNP because one of its members (alegidly) made a threat to another. Folowing this line of logic ALL MPs need to be sacked because they are all corrupt. Honestly the double standards of the trendy left is astounding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 In that case I'll give it a go. Quite frankly I'm very dissapointed at the so called enlightend ones around here jumping on the band wagon to condem everyone conected with the BNP because one of its members (alededly) made a threat to another. Folowing this line of logic ALL MPs need to be sacked because they are all corrupt. Honestly the double standards of the trendy left is astounding. Too late to claim to be the first, I have already given an apologist view that Mark Collett is innocent, here: http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showpost.php?p=6100554&postcount=36 Your argument makes no sense corruption and death threats are not moral equivalents. Interestingly Joe Owens has now revealed that Mark Collett was never questioned about the tape recording that was used to sway the BNP representatives yesterday. According to Collett the tape would only be useful to the BNP in an edited form because it also contained information about more embarassing BNP corruptions, like the party treasurer using membership money to pay for prostitutes. As I said earlier the story behind all this is the takeover of the party and its profits by Dowson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 In that case I'll give it a go. Quite frankly I'm very dissapointed at the so called enlightend ones around here jumping on the band wagon to condem everyone conected with the BNP because one of its members (alegidly) made a threat to another. Folowing this line of logic ALL MPs need to be sacked because they are all corrupt. Honestly the double standards of the trendy left is astounding. errrrrrm how many other parties members have been arrested for threatening to kill their leader? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gault Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 "Your argument makes no sense corruption and death threats are not moral equivalents" My argument is that no one should be tarred and feathered just because someone they know or associate may or may not be guilty of ANY offence, it matters not one jot if is hands in the cookei jar or assasination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Gault Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 errrrrrm how many other parties members have been arrested for threatening to kill their leader? Being arested is not being convicted, and they didn't arrest the whole lot of them did they. Prejudice is what you are full of my friend and its not prety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.