Weazel2006 Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 Yes you would turn your nose up? Simplify - just for you. You owe someone thirty quid and someone offers to chuck a quid in to help you out. You are going to turn round and say - no, I'd sooner owe thirty quid? You are so weird. I thought I was weird but you make me look normal. Now come on dragon, don't be boring .....wierd is the variety of life......without which there would be no royal family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weazel2006 Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 sorry for not replying to your other point.......no i would not want the extra quid....id owe it back anyway cause the git would want it back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonofAna Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 Now come on dragon, don't be boring .....wierd is the variety of life......without which there would be no royal family I will fight to the very last breath to support and protect the Royal family from unsubstantiated attacks on either the role they play or on the people themselves. The Queen has not harmed you or affected your life in any way other that to help improve it - though indirectly. You talk about getting rid of the Royals because they are a station above you and that is envy. You talk about their fortune because you do not have one - and that is envy. You talk about them allowing this that and the other, but that is because you do not understand their role or what they do. Britain is Royalist. We have a Monarchy and it has done us more good than harm. And you have to admit Prince Charles and Prince Phillip both make some hilarious gaffs. Well worth keeping them just to see what silly comments they are going to make next. But they are helping the economy, and all the claims about them costing us are pretty much unsubstantiated rubbish. God save the Queen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonofAna Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 sorry for not replying to your other point.......no i would not want the extra quid....id owe it back anyway cause the git would want it back The Queen does not expect any of the money she brings into the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyofborg Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 quick answer yes I can blame the queen for chavs because she should have insisted on deporting more people to the farthest reaches of the earth. when we had an empire we could have done that, but now those places can send them back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonofAna Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 I have to go now because I have to pray to the portrait of Her Majesty before I retire for the night, but I will look in tomorrow to see what other rubbish you anti-royalist scum suckers have posted. (lots of laughing faces) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weazel2006 Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 You talk about getting rid of the Royals because they are a station above you and that is envy. You talk about their fortune because you do not have one - and that is envy. How can i envy something i would not wish on my worst enemy? I would not like that kind of fortune, and deffinitely not in their shoes where they have little freedom to actually use it. If they are generating so much income why then are they not self sufficient and able to pay their own way without taxpayer income? I do not envy their position, unlike us they are born into servitude, or spend their whole lives waiting for the job to come up. Please if you claim to know me at all, focus more and get in line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyofborg Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 In theory yes but no monarch will ever test that theory because 24 hours later the country would be in anarchy with mass protests. It'd be the end of the monarchy. not necessarily it would depend on the alternatives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weazel2006 Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 If our ideals, image and culture can be summed up with one family with elevated levels of grandiur then we are a sorry lot indeed. How about turning round to the parents of a wounded or killed british soldier and explaining that because the prince serves a purpose and cause of his position, he had a gun in working order, or suitable protection against the enemy, or suitable supplies. Then explain to them why their child did not.....so does a royal have more right to organization and safety in the line of duty than one of us mere citizens?. Hats off to the royals who got stuck in during our historical battles.....but i will be damned if i will support a group of spineless cowards that live in luxury and are afforded life above our own.....**** that right off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyofborg Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 It's a funny thing though - there would be no way to do anything that would remain legal afterwards because there would be no parliament to change the law. And tbh I couldn't see any revolution taking place. yes there would, the monarch would rule as an almost absolute monarchy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.