danot Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 1) I'm sure if you look around you'll find direct attacks using the word I used in the context of intended insult.What do you mean look around.. look where? Originally posted by Digsy 2) I am not manipulating forum rules, sorry but there is no "obscure connotations in the form of euphemisms", hence adding the intended meaning of the word in brackets. In that case I apologize.. hey!, did you know aeroplanes have flange flaps?....( internal lips that strenghten the aerodynamic control surfaces) Originally posted by Digsy 3) If abusing other members is prohibited, why does it happen so often on sf? Because sf isn't actively monitored. Originally posted by Digsy 4) Why do you keep going off topic? I haven't, I responded to your post. Originally posted by Digsy Believe me if I wanted to insult, I could do so without doing it indirectly. And thank you, God bless you too. I believe you digsy.... I believe:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Did anyone else notice that when the police came they noticed that one go-kart "did not have any significant guarding" and another was unregistered (they apparently have to be registered by law) I think they were too busy breaking their own necks, in their rush to slate Islam to actually notice that teensy little fact... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Has labeling something "religious" or applying obscure connotations to things count for absolutely nothing. Alas, there's no evidence that any concessions were made for a religion or an obscure connotation was applied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted April 9, 2010 Share Posted April 9, 2010 Alas, there's no evidence that any concessions were made for a religion or an obscure connotation was applied.I'm not saying there were any made. But that doesn't mean it wasn't a factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikmouse Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 You are blaming her for her death? Nice. Im blaming her ridiculous dress thats forced on her by insecure men who worship a sky pixie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 I'm not saying there were any made. But that doesn't mean it wasn't a factor. But unless you know it was you're only speculating, an earthquake could have contributed to the accident, or a stray fork of lightning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anarchist Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 But unless you know it was you're only speculating, an earthquake could have contributed to the accident, or a stray fork of lightning! But unless you know that you are only speculating...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hazel Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 ;6114993']Australia is not exactly what i would call a health and safety aware nation.... I know Port Stephen and have been there many times and I am sure the safety restrictions are as keen there as anywhere else. Australian's are as aware of health and safety and perhaps more so than in other countries hazel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 But unless you know that you are only speculating...... ..or being sarcastic, anarchist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandad.Malky Posted April 10, 2010 Share Posted April 10, 2010 Is this thread still going ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.