Grahame Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Nobody is denying the fact that there are paedophiles in every walk of life. But this is actually a thread about the Catholic Church and its attitude towards paedophiles, it's not about paedophiles in general. Do try and get that fact into your head, and stop going on about paedophiles who aren't Catholic priests, it's irrelevant to this topic. Tell that to PT who posted about Sarah's law. Yet again, grahame, have you "opened your mouth and 'said summat' !" as my dad would have put it. You talk utter cods-wallop again, convicted paedophiles are NOT given new identities, routinely, that's the whole point of "Sarah's Law", that paedophiles are monitored and that the police know exactly who they are, and where they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Tell that to PT who posted about Sarah's law. She was putting you right on the utter tripe you posted you dolt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 She was putting you right on the utter tripe you posted you dolt. She was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 She was wrong. 'fraid not. It's you that is in error (as is often the case). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 She was wrong. Not on this occasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 Is Grahame a Catholic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I was wrong on one minor point. *holds hand up* I claimed Dozy had dubbed Grahame a dolt. when in fact it was zaytsev. Apologies for the erroneous attribution Dozy, Zaytsev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaytsev Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 I was wrong on one minor point. *holds hand up* I claimed Dozy had dubbed Grahame a dolt. when in fact it was zaytsev. Apologies for the erroneous attribution Dozy, Zaytsev. That's ok PT. He's still a dolt though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 That's ok PT. He's still a dolt though. Yes. I think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riahannon Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 There seems to be an underlying assumption in his statement that boys alone have been/are abused - surely this is not the case. I'm wondering where the Cardinal's logic would take him if he was asked to explain the abuse of young women and girls by priests.Isn't it possible that RC Nuns may have sexualy abused young girls in their care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.