Eater Sundae Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 The planks are the mob that were heckling Griffin - very undignified...but its what we've come to expect from the left...these communists go by the term "International solidarity" and wont even discuss immigration and multicultralism, in their minds we're all denizens of One global country, where there are no borders!! Utterly insane and inhuman. Labour have a cunning plan...when the Labour supporting "BME" population reaches a certern level,(due to Labours mass immigration) so confident that the BME population will vote for it, new Labour will revert back to old Labour, and the socialist dream will be realised. Thats the plan...WAKE UP. But Labour might get a shock when a lot of these entrepreneurial immigrants take a look at Labour's big government ethos, decide it's not for them, and vote accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted May 10, 2010 Author Share Posted May 10, 2010 Is there any actual proof that immigrants vote labour? I've not found any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ofTheseDays Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Is there any actual proof that immigrants vote labour? I've not found any. Talking to yourself still?? Of the immigrant population that bother to vote - aside from the ones who perhaps have a particular gripe with the Iraq/Afghan conflicts, they will nearly all vote Labour. BME people mostly vote labour, Dianne Abbott would agree with me on that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted May 10, 2010 Author Share Posted May 10, 2010 Of the BME/immigrant population that bother to vote - asside from the ones who perhaps have a gripe with the Iraq/Afghan conflicts, they will nearly all vote Labour. Any actual evidence for this? Second time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ofTheseDays Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Any actual evidence for this? Second time. Well there's this for a kick off I think Diane Abbott knows what she's talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted May 10, 2010 Author Share Posted May 10, 2010 Yes, any actual evidence except clips off Facetube? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Well there's this for a kick off I think Diane Abbott knows what she's talking about. Interesting BNP channel. I notice there are some David Irving speeches on there too. I thought the BNP were shy about their holocaust denial, and yet they seem to advertise it so often. Why do you think the BNP seem to want to rewrite the genocide of the Jews? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1ofTheseDays Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Interesting BNP channel. I notice there are some David Irving speeches on there too. I thought the BNP were shy about their holocaust denial, and yet they seem to advertise it so often. Why do you think the BNP seem to want to rewrite the genocide of the Jews? I dont give a flying toss about any holocaust denial from the BNP. Whatever the numbers are its got to be less than the communist genocides that took place in the 20th century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 I dont give a flying toss about any holocaust denial from the BNP. Whatever the numbers are its got to be less than the communist genocides that took place in the 20th century. The atrocities of Mao and Stalin would only be relevant if there was anyone downplaying them standing for election, but there isn't so the comparison is irrelevant. Even if there were it would be no excuse for the Youtube channel you linked to publicising the holocaust denier David Irving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berberis Posted May 10, 2010 Share Posted May 10, 2010 Why? Following Griffin's disastrous Question Time appearance the electorate rejected him. He took a beating. So did Terreblanche. The BNP voter share was up 1.2% on their result in the 2005 election. I'm not sure that would constitute a rejection by the electorate. I mean they gained more votes and that’s the ONLY indicator we have on their performance as they had no seats in the last election and they still have none now. Nick Griffin lost support but did come third having received nearly 3,000 more votes than the Lib Dems in Barking. Your assertion that the BNP (your boys) has taken a beating on Nick Griffins result (-1.7%) is like saying the Labour party had a great election based on Gordon Browns result (+6.4). The BNP increased its voter share. The only issue here is would their result have meant representation in the House of Commons under Lib Dem proposed proportional representation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.