Tshombe Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Quote: Originally Posted by JFKvsNixon How-about legally breaching their rights by putting them through a court and holding them in prison on remand until their trial? If guilty lock them away for a long time, if innocent, they can walk away free. What's wrong with doing it this way? How about if giving information in public would compramise the future saftey of nationals ? They don't with-hold evidance from public for nothing, they are still accountable to law and when the time is right it comes out. I think its 25 year isn't it ? What would you have us do, convict a small cell and jeopardize a big operation with operatives working inside that supplied the info that could cost more lives ? When are people going to stop sympathising for the perpetrator and start thinking about there fellow folk that could and will be the next victims without the vigil that they are taking on our behalves ? Either your British and want to protect your fellow Brits or your British and want to accuse the Gov't at every avenue and care nothing about who has who's best inters at heart. Some people are so small minded that sadly they can't see the bigger picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tshombe Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Originally Posted by tab1 Yes his discussing a girls name and describing her looks as crystal clear and the wedding arrangements having many guests at the party has to be code for a terrorist attack hasn't it. Could it be that the guy was actually discussing his arranged wedding arrangements? Which is after all what he claimed and strangely enough they also check out. Why should he be dicussing his arranged wedding plans if they've already been arranged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Some people are so small minded that sadly they can't see the bigger picture. Soe people are so small minded they repeatedly invent new pseudonyms so they can spread their nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tshombe Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Soe people are so small minded they repeatedly invent new pseudonyms so they can spread their nonsense. Seems the panic has set in, having to throw accusations around to lay a smoke screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Seems the panic has set in, having to throw accusations around to lay a smoke screen. So lamewitted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 How about if giving information in public would compramise the future saftey of nationals ? Such trials are held in camera, so that only the judge and jury ever hear the information. Either your British and want to protect your fellow Brits or your British and want to accuse the Gov't at every avenue and care nothing about who has who's best inters at heart. I'm British, and I desperately want to protect Britain and the people who live there. That's exactly why I will not depart from the British way of doing things, and why I object so strongly to people like you who are so keen to abandon them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catzeyesF Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Kill all muslims that will solve all the problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoddyHolder Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Kill all muslims that will solve all the problems. Thats rather extreme..who's going to feed the starving millions on a saturday night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catzeyesF Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Thats rather extreme..who's going to feed the starving millions on a saturday night You know you agree. Lards need to start cooking curry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Guess you don't know too much about the National Enquirer then. I have seen enough copies to know that the only thing that can be believed in the NE is the title of the publication and more often than not, the date on the masthead... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.