Al-Qaeda operative cannot be deported

[truconstruct]

Soe people are so small minded they repeatedly invent new pseudonyms so they can spread their nonsense.

 

Trolling again I see.

[truconstruct]

Such trials are held in camera, so that only the judge and jury ever hear the information.

 

Garbage, the accused hears the evidence and it has to to given to the defence before its presented in court.

[sccsux]

How about Pakistan?

 

Surely that would only apply if truconstruct was of Pakistani origin?

 

If truconstruct is of British descent, the he/she would be deported to Britain?

 

I would like to know if these people were planning a terror attack, or a wedding. Some might think that the two are very similar anyway

 

:hihi:

[depoix]

can someone explain what would happen in the event of this man being thrown out any way ? who would be in trouble for abusing his human rights and what would be the outcome

 

for those of you who remember last years fiasco when a british couple were taken hostage/kidnapped by somali pirates under the very nose of the royal navy we were told that to have stopped the kidnapping and arrested the pirates would have been an assault on their human rights

 

http://newwars.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/royal-navy-failed-to-save-british-couple/

 

 

yet here in todays news we see that a boat load of pirates have been stopped ,their attack boats sunk and they were sent packing ,in another case the russian special forces landed on a captured tanker and killed one pirate

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1279561/Navy-sinks-pirate-boats-African-coast.html, how come this happened and yet our navy was forced to watch a kidnapping and do nothing ?

 

this human rights law seems to be flexible depending on who is using /abusing it ,or is it a case of the politicians wanting to appear as good honest law abiding people who would rather see our own citizens killed or kidnapped rather than upset a set of rules that were initially designed to defend the weak of the world ,in short they dont want bad p r in the eyes of other nations

 

the russians the israelies the french,the americans take action and damn the outcome, yet we sit tight drink tea and see what will happen later ,it's time to rip up the rule book and rewrite it so that it can be used as it was first intended to be used,to defend the weak and the frightened ,the real victims

[truconstruct]

I think you'll find the interpretation has a lot to do with weak knee'd politico's.

 

I remember when we had forces stationed in Somalia there was a shoot on sight policy.

[Michael_W]

All the do gooders have latched on to the UK legal system, we really are a soft touch, a laughing stock !

[mj.scuba]

can someone explain what would happen in the event of this man being thrown out any way ? who would be in trouble for abusing his human rights and what would be the outcome

 

for those of you who remember last years fiasco when a british couple were taken hostage/kidnapped by somali pirates under the very nose of the royal navy we were told that to have stopped the kidnapping and arrested the pirates would have been an assault on their human rights

 

http://newwars.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/royal-navy-failed-to-save-british-couple/

 

 

yet here in todays news we see that a boat load of pirates have been stopped ,their attack boats sunk and they were sent packing ,in another case the russian special forces landed on a captured tanker and killed one pirate

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1279561/Navy-sinks-pirate-boats-African-coast.html, how come this happened and yet our navy was forced to watch a kidnapping and do nothing ?

 

this human rights law seems to be flexible depending on who is using /abusing it ,or is it a case of the politicians wanting to appear as good honest law abiding people who would rather see our own citizens killed or kidnapped rather than upset a set of rules that were initially designed to defend the weak of the world ,in short they dont want bad p r in the eyes of other nations

 

the russians the israelies the french,the americans take action and damn the outcome, yet we sit tight drink tea and see what will happen later ,it's time to rip up the rule book and rewrite it so that it can be used as it was first intended to be used,to defend the weak and the frightened ,the real victims

 

It might be the case that UK authorities are too concerned that they will be taken to court, either in the EU or even in our own country, both of which are highly likely to rule against our authorities. The American and Russians are not bound by such restrictions, and France are the darlings of Europe and the rules will be bent to suit them, but not us.

[truconstruct]

You know its hard for someone to claim their human rights have been abused if you make sure they're in a body bad.

 

Times have changed it seems, and not for the better.

[eastbank]

All the do gooders have latched on to the UK legal system, we really are a soft touch, a laughing stock !

 

 

these are just the bad ones we catch here....many others are shipped around the world in containers..never seeing the light of day...out of sight out of mind....lads who are serving in afghanistan tell of the way the yanks deal with the enemy...put them out of action...for good...and we probably do the same....as they say never trust a raghead

[truconstruct]

these are just the bad ones we catch here....many others are shipped around the world in containers..never seeing the light of day...out of sight out of mind....lads who are serving in afghanistan tell of the way the yanks deal with the enemy...put them out of action...for good...and we probably do the same....as they say never trust a raghead

 

There is some truth in this in that 'local' decitions are made by local CO's.

 

Its the home grown ones that its more difficult to deal with I think you'll find.