Cavegirl Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 On BBC's HARDtalk last night Hugo Chavez stated Iran and Venezuela were being bullied and villified by the US/ UN because they were the last bastions of true social democracy standing against the US's aim for world domination. Shortly after the program the BBC announced that the US had given warning to Europe that Iran could use missiles against European states at any moment. They also claim that Chavez is a dictator rather than a liberator and that he could supply weapons grade uranium to Iran. Which of these views is most likely in your opinion? Can you provide the evidence you most agree with please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 can iran beat the 45 minutes iraq could do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVAN LILLEY Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 how about erased? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanerothyme Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 It's probably more complicated than all that. Chavez is an arse. Ahmeninajad is smarter. Both have oil. Interesting times await. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavegirl Posted June 18, 2010 Author Share Posted June 18, 2010 how about erased? I'm not sure that committing mass genocide is quite the right response whatever the case I agree that it is more complex- I'm hoping people can describe and discuss that complexity so that I can get a better grasp of the situation. I also agree that oil is a big player in this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAMALOCHA! Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 how about erased? i think your referring to armourdinnerjackets speech isn't there some discrepency regarding translation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tab1 Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 i think your referring to armourdinnerjackets speech isn't there some discrepency regarding translation.There is indeed and it's brought to this poster's attention every time he decides to post his anti Iran diatribe (under whichever user name). We all know it was a mistranslation but it is so convenient that it simply can't be let go for them without seeming to lose the whole argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVAN LILLEY Posted June 19, 2010 Share Posted June 19, 2010 I'm not sure that committing mass genocide is quite the right response whatever the case I agree that it is more complex- I'm hoping people can describe and discuss that complexity so that I can get a better grasp of the situation. I also agree that oil is a big player in this. :roll:its only genocide if you loose:roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavegirl Posted June 19, 2010 Author Share Posted June 19, 2010 :roll:its only genocide if you loose:roll: Perhaps I should change the thread title to- Should Ivan Lilley be feared or pitied :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVAN LILLEY Posted June 19, 2010 Share Posted June 19, 2010 Perhaps I should change the thread title to- Should Ivan Lilley be feared or pitied :S haha, a bit of both i think. i was been flipant, i vote pitied Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.