Plain Talker Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 Powerful rich people control the media. Who'd have thought it. One word, Kthebean... "Rosebud!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 The bilderberg group control the media. Who controls the bilderberg group?i dont know, but take a look on their past guest lists you'll see the most powerful,money hungry people in the world. Occasionally you get some nobodys like Bill clinton before we'd heard of him,Tony Blair before he became labour leader,gorden brown before he did too. rest is made up nof elite in arms,food,energy, industry,bankers etc, those with a common purpose. There is an independent media as well, particularly on the internet. While I accept that paedophile rings often get helped along by fellow child molestors in the police and judiciary etc - and I also accept that this girl may well have been abused and it was covered up - these two facts to0gether still do not constitue proof that there is an all encompassing international conspiracy to cover up paedophilia controlled by the Bilderberg group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 There is an independent media as well, particularly on the internet. While I accept that paedophile rings often get helped along by fellow child molestors in the police and judiciary etc - and I also accept that this girl may well have been abused and it was covered up - these two facts to0gether still do not constitue proof that there is an all encompassing international conspiracy to cover up paedophilia controlled by the Bilderberg group. I agree donkey,the Bilderbergers are another matter. i meant mainstream media who make us trust them by revealing political scandals eg expenses claims,sex scandals etc we think the press is on our side and wont help to hide sensitive issues,its all a smokescreen for what the government are really up to ,the true government being the bilderbergers,their soldiers the freemasons and common purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 I agree donkey,the Bilderbergers are another matter. i meant mainstream media who make us trust them by revealing political scandals eg expenses claims,sex scandals etc we think the press is on our side and wont help to hide sensitive issues,its all a smokescreen for what the government are really up to ,the true government being the bilderbergers,their soldiers the freemasons and common purpose. The mainstream media is there for one reason, and one reason only. To make money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 ah you are an NWO'er. The irony of being an NWO'er is that you tend to be even more easily led than someone who refuses to accept any conspiracy theory. I'm not a NWOer as such,i don't buy into much of what is said but i do believe there is certain people in control we dont know about,trying to make sure they have control of the oil/power. The Bilderberg group seems a good place to start.i suppose reading that back i am a NWO'er(and proud). What brought me here is,around 4mnth ago i saw a documentary about 9/11(ripple effect) which brought back a few memories of that day. I remembered witnesses on tv saying they thought it was a military plane that hit the wtc buildings,a guy who said he heard missiles and explosions before that other plane came down,the way the buildings fell at freefall speed,especially wtc7 which fell like in a controlled demolition and wasn't even hit by a plane. I thought though "no way could they get away with it ,there'll be a massive investigation- independant, international but ,no there wasnt.i looked for evidence to support official story but i cant find any really.but masses which point to a government conspiricy. its because mass media have chosen to ignore the evidence that i dont trust them and now look elsewhere if i want truth.thats how i know about hollie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vResistance Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 I dont know how they did it but they did.Explain please how the plane that hit pentagon managed to fit into a 15ish foot hole leaving no wing marks and no wreckage outside. Why wtc7 fell at freefall speed as in controlled demolition though no plane even hit it.never before or since has a steal and concrete building fell due to fire just those in one afternoon. i could go on and on,but this is about hollie greig. I just posted similar on another discussion-new york bomb related ill be happy to chat on there .but gonna get some sunshine while i can.back soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donuticus Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 I dont know how they did it but they did.Explain please how the plane that hit pentagon managed to fit into a 15ish foot hole leaving no wing marks and no wreckage outside. Why wtc7 fell at freefall speed as in controlled demolition though no plane even hit it.never before or since has a steal and concrete building fell due to fire just those in one afternoon. i could go on and on,but this is about hollie greig. I just posted similar on another discussion-new york bomb related ill be happy to chat on there .but gonna get some sunshine while i can.back soon. You ask us to be open minded about incidents and then say that? SOunds like you need to open your mind a little more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynic Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 I dont know how they did it but they did.Explain please how the plane that hit pentagon managed to fit into a 15ish foot hole leaving no wing marks and no wreckage outside. Why wtc7 fell at freefall speed as in controlled demolition though no plane even hit it.never before or since has a steal and concrete building fell due to fire just those in one afternoon. i could go on and on,but this is about hollie greig. I just posted similar on another discussion-new york bomb related ill be happy to chat on there .but gonna get some sunshine while i can.back soon. You are on to something. I'd lock your doors and close your curtains, they will be coming for you. The men in white coats that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teddie Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 You keep missing the point - she is not a "little girl of 29" is she? She was a litle girl at 4, yes, but she is not a little girl at 29. Yes, I am missing the point. When she was 4 she was abused, she grew up and is now 29, she was abused for 14 years by her father and his "friends". It has taken this long for it to become mainstream news, but this isn't new news, people have been aware of this case for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoeshine Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 You ask us to be open minded about incidents and then say that? SOunds like you need to open your mind a little more. Off topic, for sure, donuticus! But these two links Part 1 and then Part 2 may give you cause to reconsider your above quoted response to "vResistance". Two short video items (6min each) and the associated article/comments may be of interest. Here ............. However, to return to the subject of this particular thread ..... Until recently, I've been following the Hollie Grieg Website for several months. I'm unable to decide which of the two parties involved in this long- running dispute are being truthful. Whatever the eventual outcome of the case is, one can only hope that the truth "will out" in due course, sooner rather than later for Hollie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.