andyofborg Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 That is what I am getting at. It would be better if they quit the gimmicks and got on with governing. i can't imagine nick or anyone important going through the postings, it will probably be done by a minor official or a work experience kid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 i can't imagine nick or anyone important going through the postings, it will probably be done by a minor official or a work experience kid Seems reasonable. After all, isn't that how some of the laws were devised in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eckerslike Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Thatcher's anti-union laws Ban trade unions all together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Ban trade unions all together. And we'd soon all be working for the minimum wage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eckerslike Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Drop the ruling that says a company can't sack strikers and replace them with folk who want to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Drop the ruling that says a company can't sack strikers and replace them with folk who want to work. Why not go the whole hog and ask for the return of the feudal system or slavery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandad.Malky Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Ludicrous laws for the chop. The one that allows someone that came 3rd in an election to even think about changing laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Apparently, the majority of input from the public has been not to suggest laws that they want repealed, but to suggest new laws they want introduced. There was an article about this in the Times yesterday - to which I cannot link since the Times website is now pay-only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex C. Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Apparently, the majority of input from the public has been not to suggest laws that they want repealed, but to suggest new laws they want introduced. There was an article about this in the Times yesterday - to which I cannot link since the Times website is now pay-only. the FT seem to have realised as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted July 3, 2010 Share Posted July 3, 2010 Ludicrous laws for the chop. The one that allows someone that came 3rd in an election to even think about changing laws. How about the law that allows the one that came 2nd to try and get the one that came 3rd to join with them to stop the one that came 1st from being in power? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.