garrence Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 i think spindrift should learn to think for themselves ... rather than simply believe every study they read that backs up their preconceptions and not noticing how their own statistics disagree? Yeah, turn up your sanity filter, Spindrift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 This thread reminds me Lee Macks drinking and driving routine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted July 7, 2010 Author Share Posted July 7, 2010 ... rather than simply believe every study they read that backs up their preconceptions and not noticing how their own statistics disagree? Yeah, turn up your sanity filter, Spindrift. Just to clarify, you are defending drivers who chat on a mobile? Simple question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garrence Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 Just to clarify, you are defending drivers who chat on a mobile? Simple question. I've answered that in post #85. Will you answer my question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydotcom Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 This thread reminds me Lee Macks drinking and driving routine love it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted July 7, 2010 Author Share Posted July 7, 2010 I've answered that in post #85. Will you answer my question? You dispute the research? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garrence Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 You dispute the research? I get the feeling this is going to continue all night. As the person who made the assertion that using a mobile phone is more dangerous than drunk driving - and also claimed there are 11 deaths from using a mobile and 400 from drunk drivers - it is your job to defend your assertion. So the dispute is between your study and your statistics. Please either explain why you think that don't contradict each other, or retract the assertion and apologise to those you insulted who questioned it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted July 7, 2010 Author Share Posted July 7, 2010 I get the feeling this is going to continue all night. As the person who made the assertion that using a mobile phone is more dangerous than drunk driving - and also claimed there are 11 deaths from using a mobile and 400 from drunk drivers - it is your job to defend your assertion. So the dispute is between your study and your statistics. Please either explain why you think that don't contradict each other, or retract the assertion and apologise to those you insulted who questioned it. If you dispute the research, please explain. Eighth time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydotcom Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 I get the feeling this is going to continue all night. As the person who made the assertion that using a mobile phone is more dangerous than drunk driving - and also claimed there are 11 deaths from using a mobile and 400 from drunk drivers - it is your job to defend your assertion. So the dispute is between your study and your statistics. Please either explain why you think that don't contradict each other, or retract the assertion and apologise to those you insulted who questioned it. i doubt either will happen! im going to bed to think of a way to get them to answer even the most simple of questions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garrence Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 If you dispute the research, please explain. Eighth time. LOL OK I dispute the research because your figures contradict it. In other words, you disputed it first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.