protocolin Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 They can only give a verbal warning to the said person with proof that they have done something wrong if there is no proof stop worrying ! That may be true in theory, but in practice the guy WILL get a warning and there will be no proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Constructive D? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeysuckle Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 That may be true in theory, but in practice the guy WILL get a warning and there will be no proof. No in practice the guy must NOT accept the warning unless there is proof ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
protocolin Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 No in practice the guy must NOT accept the warning unless there is proof ! OK. Tell me what you think he should do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 OK. Tell me what you think he should do. play shaggys "it wasnt me" on his mobile phone in the disciplinary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
protocolin Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 play shaggys "it wasnt me" on his mobile phone in the disciplinary? It is becoming very obvious that you and working for living parted company many moons ago! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 It is becoming very obvious that you and working for living parted company many moons ago! tch, tother way round mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
protocolin Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 tch, tother way round mate Meaning what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
protocolin Posted July 19, 2010 Author Share Posted July 19, 2010 He just phoned me. They have sacked him saying that he was still on trial. Ah well...that's life I guess! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansheff Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Sounds like they were looking for an excuse to get rid of people and this gave them the chance, he needs to contact the union if he is in one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.