Skirmisher Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I don't know what video you've been watching, but it certainly looks like he hit Tomlinson to me. He hardly had time to flinch, he was pushed over straight after. You've got to admit, the police officer shouldn't of acted in that way. Tomlinson was walking away, hands in pockets. No need for the shove. The police officer in question should lose his job. He's not cut out for it. What a prat! You've just confirmed my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 I have just heard on the bbc that the police have apologised admitted shortcomings and have reached an undisclosed settlement. Bearing in mind we pay for the police-have they got any right to keep a settlement undisclosed:huh: Thats our money they have squandered! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peer Gynt Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 give the copper a medal well said ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 10:20 ---------- Bearing in mind we pay for the police! Yes we also paid for the police to protect Abu Hamza whilst every Friday he blocked a public highway and preached bile and hatred against our country, we also benefits to him and his brood. ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 10:24 ---------- The baton swings, no contact seems to have been made, Ian gave no indication that he felt a blow from the baton. Anyone, other than the complete idiots that are just out for a policemans blood, would therefore accept that the baton DID NOT HIT TOMLINSON. You always get the anti police wallahs baying for blood. The guy was in the middle of a riot, anyone with half an ounce of common sense would have avoided that area like the plague. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 well said ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 10:20 ---------- Yes we also paid for the police to protect Abu Hamza whilst every Friday he blocked a public highway and preached bile and hatred against our country, we also benefits to him and his brood. freedom of speech, just like you bunging this forum up with your islamaphobic bile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 well said ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 10:20 ---------- Yes we also paid for the police to protect Abu Hamza whilst every Friday he blocked a public highway and preached bile and hatred against our country, we also benefits to him and his brood. ---------- Post added 05-08-2013 at 10:24 ---------- You always get the anti police wallahs baying for blood. The guy was in the middle of a riot, anyone with half an ounce of common sense would have avoided that area like the plague. The area was being kettled iirc so he would have had to pass a copper somewhere. Sadly he passed THAT copper rather than the others who do a good job in trying circumstances. He was just trying to get home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peer Gynt Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 freedom of speech, just like you bunging this forum up with your islamaphobic bile Oh so typical, so you agree do you with our police whose wages we paid guarding him every Friday whilst he blocked a street and preached anti UK Bile and anti western bile whilst being happy to collect benefits paid for by the very people he reviled? And to make matters worse what he preached whilst being guarded by the police was against the law in the UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Oh so typical, so you agree do you with our police whose wages we paid guarding him every Friday whilst he blocked a street and preached anti UK Bile and anti western bile whilst being happy to collect benefits paid for by the very people he reviled? And to make matters worse what he preached whilst being guarded by the police was against the law in the UK. That's the nature of free speech, it applies to everyone even those whose views we don't necessarily agree with, provided what they have to say is within the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peer Gynt Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 That's the nature of free speech, it applies to everyone even those whose views we don't necessarily agree with, provided what they have to say is within the law. Come on BF I'm surprised at you, what he did and said was illegal and not within the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 That's the nature of free speech, it applies to everyone even those whose views we don't necessarily agree with, provided what they have to say is within the law. Hamza was found guilty of inciting murder and race hate wasn't he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peer Gynt Posted August 5, 2013 Share Posted August 5, 2013 Hamza was found guilty of inciting murder and race hate wasn't he? Eventually, yes, even the Queen commented on how disgraceful it was for going on so long. And guess what us Islamaphobes had to pick up the bill whilst he lived on our benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.