alchresearch Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 It looks like a harsh sentence to me for an offence as relatively trivial as looking at rude pictures online. Its a bit more serious than that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KellieB Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Taking into account the time he has already spent in prison and time off for good behaviour then we can assume a convicted child killer/paedophile will be back on our streets in the next few months. The worrying aspect of this is that he could be sent somewhere near you and I'm sure that all people from Liverpool with a scouse accent, around the same age and large build as he is will be suspected of being him if they move into a new area. The people of Liverpool will pay the price and not him, ever, according to our justice system. Things really have to change here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 It looks like a harsh sentence to me for an offence as relatively trivial as looking at rude pictures online. Were the jury told about his previous convictions? The jury don't pass the sentence; they only decide on guilt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
julado Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 It looks like a harsh sentence to me for an offence as relatively trivial as looking at rude pictures online. Were the jury told about his previous convictions? Rude pictures of CHILDREN!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 What bothers me most is the time scale this happened. Distributing images in February 2008 Downloading images from February 2009 to February 2010 ...and he was only caught because of a raid. If the raid hadn't taken place how much longer would he have gone on doing it? Would he have gone further than just pictures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostrider Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 The thing is, he has now waived his right to anonimity, so when he is released it will be under his real name. I doubt he will get another identity and protection, so basically, everyone will know who and where he is. As soon as he gets somewhere to live it will be all over the papers..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 The thing is, he has now waived his right to anonimity, so when he is released it will be under his real name. I doubt he will get another identity and protection, so basically, everyone will know who and where he is. As soon as he gets somewhere to live it will be all over the papers..... Knowing that is exactly the reason why he will have to be given a new identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farslad Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 How much has this vile waste of space cost? And its only going to go up. Until someonbe gets their hands on him. And they will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 And its only going to go up. Until someonbe gets their hands on him. And they will. If it were not for people taking that attitude, he wouldn't need protecting and he wouldn't be costing society anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farslad Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 If it were not for people taking that attitude, he wouldn't need protecting and he wouldn't be costing society anything. Oh be quiet. I called him a vile waste of space. He is. I said someone will get their hands on him. They will. I never said I advocated that or thought it was the correct thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.