cressida Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Lets hope he isn't drunk when in an aircraft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ms Macbeth Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Lets hope he isn't drunk when in an aircraft Why would he be? There's nothing in the report to suggest he had been drinking - he was found guilty of dangerous driving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Why would he be? There's nothing in the report to suggest he had been drinking - he was found guilty of dangerous driving. maybe cressys drunk? *looks at watch* at 12.30 too tch, norty gurl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cressida Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 maybe cressys drunk? *looks at watch* at 12.30 too tch, norty gurl well there's a possibility he might be:rolleyes: I'm a toeteetaller as you well know:P;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 well there's a possibility he might be:rolleyes: I'm a toeteetaller as you well know:P;) your toes make you taller? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 your toes make you taller? If you put tees under them, I should think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Does anyone find it odd that luck has a lot to do with your sentence? For instance: Two young ladies Alice and Bertha get really drunk on an icy night and, stupidly, drive (separately) to their homes. They both end up skidding on the ice and crashing into a tree on their way. The only difference between their circumstances is that there was a 5 year old girl standing in front of Alice's tree when she crashed into it. It seems to me that Alice and Bertha were acting equally irresponsibly, yet there will be a huge difference in punishment due to luck/unluck. P.S. I'm not making an argument here, just an interesting observation! It raises the fundamental issue of what the purpose of punishment is. He has the knowledge that he has killed two innocent people by his actions. If he shows remorse and is prepared to offer reparation, is it necessary to punish him more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cressida Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 your toes make you taller? My Havanas make me taller and I need them with maxi dresses:P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waldo Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Maybe someone who is a contributor to our society should be treatd more leniently. If that is the case, or does become the case; I would hope that our 'society' crumbles and self destructs with all possible speed, for it would not be a society worth keeping ... where convenience and profit are put ahead of truth and justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 He has the knowledge that he has killed two innocent people by his actions. If he shows remorse and is prepared to offer reparation, is it necessary to punish him more? That's fine if you are going to treat everyone the same under those circumstances. The implication in the ruling is that he was given special considration because of his social status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.