johncocker Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 That's fine, you're totally entitled to hold that view, but it happens to be one I dont agree with. which one do you agree with, burning somebody to death? ,coming from somebody who says if someone calls my kids inferior I'd take something more than a zippo to them bit hyopchritical ..init:suspect: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artisan Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 ..and that's why he's been sent to prison for at least 40 years, for taking away their right to life. He did, we know what not, to those little girls, and he gets away with 40 years. The animal should swing. Is that better, spindrift Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 He did we know what not to those little girls, and he gets away with 40 years. The animal should swing. Your bloodlust is interfering with your ability to string a sentence together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artisan Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 Your bloodlust is interfering with your ability to string a sentence together. Very smart. You obviously want him out tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johncocker Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 is'nt this where the halibut makes an apperance followed by plain talker then the "mother of all logic "boy friday to tell us lesser mortals what low life's we are for even thinking of punishment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted July 31, 2010 Author Share Posted July 31, 2010 which one do you agree with, burning somebody to death? No nothing like that ,coming from somebody who says if someone calls my kids inferior I'd take something more than a zippo to them bit hyopchritical ..init:suspect: You're obviously struggling with contextual arguments so I'll explain in the simplest terms-that remark was on another thread and was in relation to a regime, not an individual. It's perfectly possible to denounce the death penalty and not be a pacifist, there's nothing hypocritical about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted July 31, 2010 Author Share Posted July 31, 2010 is'nt this where the halibut makes an apperance followed by plain talker then the "mother of all logic "boy friday to tell us lesser mortals what low life's we are for even thinking of punishment ..I don't remember describing anyone as being a 'low life', perhaps your strategy in attacking personalities, rather than what they say, speaks volumes for the weak nature of your argument, assuming it can be described as such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artisan Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 is'nt this where the halibut makes an apperance followed by plain talker then the "mother of all logic "boy friday to tell us lesser mortals what low life's we are for even thinking of punishment I think theyhave formed a new site. It is callled Sanctimonious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindrift Posted July 31, 2010 Share Posted July 31, 2010 Very smart. You obviously want him out tomorrow. There is a middle ground between wishing torture upon the man and wanting him released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted July 31, 2010 Author Share Posted July 31, 2010 He did, we know what not, to those little girls, and he gets away with 40 years. Forty years was the minimum sentence, I wouldnt like to take a bet on him ever seeing the light of day again. In his position, I'd consider the rope being preferable to 40 years of nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.