kabacha Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Of course they would,as would tab1 ,catseyes or any other muslim,doesnt mean to say just because its said its correct does it,the funny thing about any situations like this is that the minority,as is stated,usually seem to outnumber the majority,maybe the definition of the words are reversed in some languagesSo would you say any of the names I mentioned and the names you mentioned can't speak the language and would not be fitting in. Where is this forum Islamabad or Sheffield? Those people living the lIving their lives as Muslims would in your estimation know less about the society they live in than someone like yourself guessing at the situation from the outside of that community? Strange logic but if your are content and blissful in your knowledge then it's not for me to change that my friend. I don't know what language you're refering to but information is that only English has been used here and that the word 'majority' is understood to be an English word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 That is not true. Every terrorist attack resulting in the death's of Israeli citizens makes headline news. Rubbsih, it was the israeli retaliation last week to the palestinian rocket attcks that made the headlins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Rubbsih, it was the israeli retaliation last week to the palestinian rocket attcks that made the headlins. Rubbish, were there any ISREALI deaths? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kabacha Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Rubbish, were there any ISREALI deaths? Maybe to mention Israel's terror attacks is now regarded anti semitic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Every terrorist attack resulting in the deaths of Israeli citizens makes headline news. Rubbsih, it was the israeli retaliation last week to the palestinian rocket attcks that made the headlins. It seems you have problems reading and understanding English.There were no deaths or injuries in the Ashkelon attack, which was anyway widely reported. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/world/middleeast/31mideast.html. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Rubbish, were there any ISREALI deaths? Oh so they have to do a head count before they can retaliate to terrorist rockets, that beggars belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bassman62 Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 It seems you have problems reading and understanding English.There were no deaths or injuries in the Ashkelon attack. So how many Israelis have to be killed before you made up war games rules say that they can retaliate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 So how many Israelis have to be killed before you made up war games rules say that they can retaliate? Where did I say that? If you had a reasonable case to put, then you wouldn't need to lie about what other people have said all the time. Two posts in a row you have completely misconstrued what has been said. Pathetic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huzoor Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 Oh so they have to do a head count before they can retaliate to terrorist rockets, that beggars belief.And if you my friend had bothered to do a head count it would have been a zero. So disproving your claim that Israeli deaths are not reported by the media as much as the Palestinians. seeing as there were no Israeli deaths would you expect them to make up lies as you constantly but unsuccessfully attempt to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huzoor Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 Where did I say that? If you had a reasonable case to put, then you wouldn't need to lie about what other people have said all the time. Two posts in a row you have completely misconstrued what has been said. Pathetic! Totally agree with you sir, sometimes a few people on here just wish to argue for the sake of arguing rather than debate, unfortunate really because it gets so many posts deleted or threads locked it's hardly worth responding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.