HeadingNorth Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 Could have been worse, could have been Chelsea or Chardonnay While those might be silly names, they're not likely to see a child ostracised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fareast Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 Many years ago, when I lived in the U.K. my first son was called ' John ' [ I think ? ]. I DO know he was a rotten, little nuisance-----always demanding sweets, ice-creams and pocket money. I wish now, I 'd called him something like, ' Attila Bluebeard Stalin '----maybe someone would have taken him into care ? As it was, I was lumbered with him until the age of 18, when he shot off to live with a fishmonger 's widow, in Doncaster [ I think ? ]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 so somebody as usual paints a false damning picture of political correctness when in fact the persons involved were actually involved for being nutters instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 A friend of mine has a son called Cameron, he is worried that he is about to be taken into care any minute! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamChiChi Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 so somebody as usual paints a false damning picture of political correctness when in fact the persons involved were actually involved for being nutters instead? That should be the tagline to this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 Based on available evidence, having a child called Muhammad is not likely to expose that child to constant bullying and negative behaviour. Having a child called Adolf Hitler ... well, I'd give his life expectancy at school as being about three days. would any child today know who adolf hitler was unless they had been taught to hate him ? i doubt it ,english history taught in schools isnt what it once was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 A friend of mine has a son called Cameron, he is worried that he is about to be taken into care any minute! My brother Nick changed his name by deed poll to "Child molester" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aries22 Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 would any child today know who adolf hitler was unless they had been taught to hate him ? i doubt it ,english history taught in schools isnt what it once was Has History changed over time l wonder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 would any child today know who adolf hitler was unless they had been taught to hate him ? i doubt it ,english history taught in schools isnt what it once was The kid involved is a septic tank! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ sheffield Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 Based on available evidence, having a child called Muhammad is not likely to expose that child to constant bullying and negative behaviour. Having a child called Adolf Hitler ... well, I'd give his life expectancy at school as being about three days. I got loads of stick at school because of my name, every day I had to listen to the kids singing Rudolf The Red Nosed Reindeer and laughing at me, I'm so angry at my parents for calling me Rudolf Hess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.