Plain Talker Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Then spell it out oh wise one. - at 2113 hours I am waiting. at 2118 hours Come on! Waiting just five minutes before spitting the dummy out because you didn't get a reply,. You're being a bit impatient, aren't you? some of us don't get replies for up to an hour after! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 I always eat the meat of dead animals. The bible does to : Leviticus 22:8 He shall not eat an animal which dies or is torn by beasts, becoming unclean by it; I am the LORD. Grahame? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iansheff Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Fine, just don't drink the blood and put it on the ground. No problem. Stunning is more humane so why not do it? I agree there are no rules either way in either the Bible or the Koran so where is the problem other than Muslims making rules up regarding stunning? My consideration is to the animal and to do it as humanly as possible. I can't see a problem with that? Either way you won't be eating blood. I'm off to bed. Thats Black pudding out then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 ..the trouble is, according to the RSPCA (link posted previously, several times), the captive bolt is not intended to be used to kill the animal, besides which how can you describe a bolt fired through the skull and into the brain as being humane? I'm sure if this were the Muslim weapon of choice even more people would be frothing from the mouth about them. Instantaneous death is more humane than a lingering concious death. Muslims want a slow death to keep the heart pumping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Instantaneous death is more humane than a lingering concious death. Muslims want a slow death to keep the heart pumping. Muslims want the blood drained as should you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 You're being a bit impatient, aren't you? some of us don't get replies for up to an hour after! awww diddums:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Muslims want the blood drained as should you! The blood is drained out. I posted a link a few posts back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 awww diddums:hihi: diddums off, ricgem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Instantaneous death is more humane than a lingering concious death. Muslims want a slow death to keep the heart pumping. slow? the prescribed method of cut is to allow swift loss of consciousness, and swift exsanguination, as pointed out umpteen times, grahame. FGS, keep up with the game, and don't get bogged down and blinded by your "Islam is dreadful! " gubbins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Grahame post #382 is awaiting your response Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.