donuticus Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Would never happen. He'd get bumped off like his mum before they would let him near the throne. They couldn't have a king that came from two 'commoners'. Lady Diana Spencer wasn't a commoner. The clue, is quite literally, in her title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Spyda Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 She was no lady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenyweeny Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 yes i think charles should let his elder son take the monarchy.reason is i think charles fluffed up with diana.these 2 seem ideal and very much in love,they have had a long courtship so in my eyes they got a damn good chance of a successful union.and hes dianas son so surley some good is to come of this.good luck to them both.diana will have been looking down at her son and his new wife.so goodness will prevail.im just old fashioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mangoes Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Charles has massive ears, so he should be king as the ears will prop his crown up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppins Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 If Wills is king then Kate is queen, right ? so is Charles is king what will Camille be, ? if not queen, why not ? I've forgotten all that stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 No, the Royal queue for the Throne should remain as it is (and when I say Throne I don't mean the Loo ), Will and Kate will be King and Queen eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I never understand this argument. Why isn't the argument "should Elizabeth II step aside?", because she is the 85 year old. good to know ism not the only one. always thought the same. she's done her bit. she should retire to St james's or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snook Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Lady Diana Spencer wasn't a commoner. The clue, is quite literally, in her title. Yes she was, anybody can be a 'Lady' whether they are a commoner or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mangoes Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I think that charles should be next in line for the throne as he is full of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 If Wills is king then Kate is queen, right ? so is Charles is king what will Camille be, ? if not queen, why not ? I've forgotten all that stuff Camilla will never be Queen, at best she'd be the King's consort if/when Charles becomes King. Diana would've been Queen though, and like Kate she was from a middle class background.. And, she was better looking that Camilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.