february Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I never understand this argument. Why isn't the argument "should Elizabeth II step aside?", because she is the 85 year old. It is the Queen's duty to reign until she dies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
february Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Charles has massive ears, so he should be king as the ears will prop his crown up. Love it!! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
february Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 No, the Royal queue for the Throne should remain as it is (and when I say Throne I don't mean the Loo ), Will and Kate will be King and Queen eventually. Couldn't agree more. Charles should have his turn at being King, this is his birth right. William and Kate need time to them selves for years to come yet, let them live a little before they take on their duty as King and Queen in the future. Lovely wedding day for them, Kate looked Gorgeous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 What model did you have in mind? If Head of State is to remain a largely ceremonial role, why change who fills it? Because hereditary offices are offensive and unfair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 he would never step aside, [whats this got to do with sheffield]Last time I heard, Sheffield was still in England, This is about the future king of England. Is Sheffield seceding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I think they should all step aside. I'm embarrassed to have any monarch. Having said that I think I'll be extra embarrassed when Charles is king, the man is a fool. jUst think, you could have a president. Dubya isn't employed at the moment, Would he do? You don't seem to like any of your PMs lately. How would you find a President? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee79 Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Last time I heard, Sheffield was still in England, This is about the future king of England. Is Sheffield seceding? I think when they first wrote that comment the thread was in the Sheffield Discussion section and has since been moved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I think when they first wrote that comment the thread was in the Sheffield Discussion section and has since been moved.Where did they move it to? Sports? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingjimmy Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 jUst think, you could have a president. That would be fantastic. How would you find a President?practically infinitely better than a monarch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
callippo Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 no. If this thing is going to continue, monarchs just wait their turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.