Jump to content

What existed before the big bang? Something must have!


Recommended Posts

But that is exactly what I'm not doing. It is in fact scientists that are making those presumptions, what I'm doing is questioning their logic.

 

Well that's fair enough (and quite rightly the scientific method) but with the equipment available it simply isn't possible to know the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that is exactly what I'm not doing. It is in fact scientists that are making those presumptions, what I'm doing is questioning their logic.

 

No you aren't, stop throwing around the word logic when you clearly don't understand it.

 

You are questioning things that don't make sense to you, logic has very little to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something had to bang? something had to create the bang, a bang can not create a noise without something solid to bang

 

The Big Bang was not a literal explosion. Indeed, the name was coined by scientists who thought it was a silly idea, to show how silly an idea it was.

 

They turned out to be wrong when we found the "echoes" of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. It doesnt make it any less true though. Quantum mechanics is another field that appears to be exceedingly strange at first - in fact as someone once said, if you haven't been shocked by quantum theory you have not grasped or understood it.

 

 

 

Why does there have to be? It's a serious question - there is nothing that says there must be something there...

that maybe why it's flawed Obelix.:hihi:;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that's fair enough (and quite rightly the scientific method) but with the equipment available it simply isn't possible to know the answer.
That's why I haven't asked for any.. I only asked for theories.:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you aren't, stop throwing around the word logic when you clearly don't understand it.

 

You are questioning things that don't make sense to you, logic has very little to do with it.

Incorrect Jimmy. scientific logic(which is what I'm questioning)has everything to do with it. Simply because it cannot support it's own claim that nothing exists beyond the expanding universe, nor can it satisfactorily explain the question that I've asked.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.