danot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Share Posted August 10, 2010 Don't be silly, if they thought they knew it all why call it a theory? ......what is your problem with science?I haven't a problem with science per se. It's the "matter of fact" attitude they have regarding their theories on what "most probably" did or didn't happened at the beginning of all creation. It's human arrogant at it's finest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 I haven't a problem with science per se. It's the "matter of fact" attitude they have regarding their theories on what "most probably" did or didn't happened at the beginning of all creation. It's human arrogant at it's finest. So are you now saying that the "big bang" was the beginning of all creation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esme Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 There's no sense in asking a question which no-one can answer. Wouldn't you agree?.yes I would, however who says the question cannot be answered ? maybe you missed this, so I'll repost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Share Posted August 10, 2010 I refer you back to your previous post:- "There's no sense in asking a question which no-one can answer. Wouldn't you agree?" ....I'll wait right here *for* you. Are you implying that I was asking for the answer to that question?.. over to you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Share Posted August 10, 2010 So are you now saying that the "big bang" was the beginning of all creation?No, I don't believe I have said that.. I haven't have I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 I haven't a problem with science per se. It's the "matter of fact" attitude they have regarding their theories on what "most probably" did or didn't happened at the beginning of all creation. It's human arrogant at it's finest. No, I don't believe I have said that.. I haven't have I? Look like you did.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Share Posted August 10, 2010 yes I would, however who says the question cannot be answered ?Ok then esme, who's going to answer it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Share Posted August 10, 2010 Look like you did....When was the beginning of all creation truman?.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 When was the beginning of all creation truman?.. You tell me ,you're the one commenting on scientists attitude to it.....so I figured you must have some idea as to what you're referring to.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mj.scuba Posted August 10, 2010 Share Posted August 10, 2010 Is it strange that scientists refer to a "God particle" in theorising about the start of the Universe? Not the theory itself, but to call it "God Particle"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.