Jump to content

HAARP.Haarmless or Haarmful ?


Recommended Posts

I;ve been to the Duga sites, they are nothing like a nuclear device. It's just a big radar. About the only nuclear thing about it is the abckground radiation from Chernobyl.

 

Sorry you must be misunderstanding me, I didn't mean that Duga was anything nuclear, Duga is the old Russian version of what the conspiracy theorists have been complaining about in Alaska.

 

If you click the link in the quote, you'll see that in 2008 the Russians claimed to have built an electromagnetic generator small enough to fit on a dining table and provides enough power to match a nuclear unit.

 

That's what I meant by they've moved on abit since then.

HAARP technology is fairly old news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry you must be misunderstanding me, I didn't mean that Duga was anything nuclear, Duga is the old Russian version of what the conspiracy theorists have been complaining about in Alaska.

 

If you click the link in the quote, you'll see that in 2008 the Russians claimed to have built an electromagnetic generator small enough to fit on a dining table and provides enough power to match a nuclear unit.

 

That's what I meant by they've moved on abit since then.

HAARP technology is fairly old news.

 

I'm aware of similar devices/technology.

Haarp maybe old news to some but many have not heard of it.

I've had a look at that duga thing,quite impressive.

Won't impress obelix though,he's probably got one on his kitchen table.

I believe the "fuss" about Haarp could be a distraction from other technology we should perhaps have concerns about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Anyone that doesn't think THEY can use these things as weapons should watch this, shown on 'richplanet.net' ,last week (showcase,sky ch 201)

Also some other interesting points raised about Muad'Dib,wikileaks and the Julian Assange case.

Good old Richard Hall,it's like he made it just for me.

 

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=37&part=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that doesn't think THEY can use these things as weapons should watch this, shown on 'richplanet.net' ,last week (showcase,sky ch 201)

Also some other interesting points raised about Muad'Dib,wikileaks and the Julian Assange case.

Good old Richard Hall,it's like he made it just for me.

 

http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=37&part=1

 

I have no intention of sitting through drivel - tell me what you think it proves and I might answer though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not talking about crap lager.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program

The government say its for communications with submarines and spacecraft/stations.

It also has capabilities for use as a weapon and potential to manipulate the weather.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY4HGs-9JiU

I think we should get it down,we did without for long enough.

 

i bet you seen the post i made the other day about Haarp lol believe me don't get your info from Wikipedia try and research for your self then you might understand it more its far from new been around for years this is the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i bet you seen the post i made the other day about Haarp lol believe me don't get your info from Wikipedia try and research for your self then you might understand it more its far from new been around for years this is the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.

 

How is a radio transmitter a WMD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.