"Most muslims are terrorists" a racist lie.

[splodgeyAl]

Sorry but your words are quite clear. If you meant something else you should have said something else.

 

What you said was: On A Level results days it's worth pointing out that 7% is worse than 6% in terrorism terms.

 

7% is a greater proportion than 6%. That's about all you can say without making a value judgement. 7% is "better" than 6% in the eyes of a Muslim terrrrrrrrist, I'd argue.

[Bulgarian]

Excellent, another muslims thread.

[spindrift]

Old 19-06-2010, 19:49 #566

NoddyHolder

 

"Proven that the majority of terrorists are indeed muslim based "

 

http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?p=6376613&highlight=terrorists#post6376613

 

Do you post racist lies then immediately forget what you posted?

 

Guffaw!

 

And again:

16-06-2010, 12:10 #450

NoddyHolder

"it just so happens that most terrorism nowadays is the product of the muslim religion. "

 

http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=595512&highlight=terrorists&page=23

 

You've posted ignorant, racist garbage.

 

I've just demonstrated that you're wrong.

 

Again.

 

the silence is deafening...

[English]

On the FBI’s official website, there exists a chronological list of all terrorist attacks committed on U.S. soil from the year 1980 all the way to 2005. That list can be accessed here (scroll down all the way to the bottom).

 

http://www.fbi.gov/publications/terror/terrorism2002_2005.htm

 

According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%). These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion. These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.

 

Yet notice the disparity in media coverage between the two. It would indeed be very interesting to construct a corresponding pie chart that depicted the level of media coverage of each group. The reason that Muslim apologists and their “leftist dhimmi allies” cannot recall another non-Islamic act of terrorism other than Waco is due to the fact that the media gives menial (if any) coverage to such events.

 

 

If a terrorist attack does not fit the “Islam is the perennial and existential threat of our times” narrative, it is simply not paid much attention to, which in a circuitous manner reinforces and “proves” the preconceived narrative.

 

It is to such an extent that the average American cannot remember any Jewish or Latino terrorist; why should he when he has never even heard of the Jewish Defense League or the Ejercito Popular Boricua Macheteros? Surely what he does not know does not exist!

 

 

 

 

The data gathered by Europol strengthens my argument even further.

 

http://www.europol.europa.eu/index.asp?page=publications&language=

 

Europol publishes an annual report entitled EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report. On their official website, you can access the reports from 2007, 2008, and 2009.

 

 

The results are stark, and prove decisively that not all terrorists are Muslims.

 

In fact, a whopping 99.6% of terrorist attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups; a good 84.8% of attacks were from separatist groups completely unrelated to Islam.

 

 

Leftist groups accounted for over sixteen times as much terrorism as radical Islamic groups.

 

 

Only a measly 0.4% of terrorist attacks from 2007 to 2009 could be attributed to extremist Muslims.

 

 

We have analyzed data from America and Europe (a good portion of the entire Western world), and the threat from Islamic terrorism is much more minimal than commonly assumed; in the U.S., it accounts for 6% of terrorist attacks, and in Europe not even half of a percent.

 

It is only through sensationalism and fear mongering that the topic of Islamic terrorism is allowed to be used to demonize a religious community that happens to be a minority in the West. When confronted by such lunacy, we ought to respond with the facts and the truth.

 

 

 

Very Interesting, I never knew about the JDL.

 

 

Thanks for posting

[upinwath]

This is so easy, it hardly requires a rocket scientist to work it out.

Bush, like most failed leaders (And thick pillock), needed an enemy to cover his own stupidity. Muslims works well because few people know much about them and the tabloids love to print bull about someone in funny clothes.

When it comes to Blair, even easier. He did it for the cash. Mr Tony Blair, I'm sure most people will not be shocked to learn, is being paid millions by US interests.

 

Girls and boys, our ex PM screwed the country big style, killing a lot of people for money.

[Mecky]

This is so easy, it hardly requires a rocket scientist to work it out.

Bush, like most failed leaders (And thick pillock), needed an enemy to cover his own stupidity. Muslims works well because few people know much about them and the tabloids love to print bull about someone in funny clothes.

When it comes to Blair, even easier. He did it for the cash. Mr Tony Blair, I'm sure most people will not be shocked to learn, is being paid millions by US interests.

 

Girls and boys, our ex PM screwed the country big style, killing a lot of people for money.

 

Anyone have a needle and cotton, my sides have split from laughing too much.

[spindrift]

This is so easy, it hardly requires a rocket scientist to work it out.

Bush, like most failed leaders (And thick pillock), needed an enemy to cover his own stupidity. Muslims works well because few people know much about them and the tabloids love to print bull about someone in funny clothes.

When it comes to Blair, even easier. He did it for the cash. Mr Tony Blair, I'm sure most people will not be shocked to learn, is being paid millions by US interests.

 

Girls and boys, our ex PM screwed the country big style, killing a lot of people for money.

 

 

Quite.

 

It is easy to pander to the lowest common demoninator.

 

People believe muslims are all mad bombers because they want to believe it, because they are racist.

 

You wonder if they lie in bed at night, listening for muslim bombers under the floorboards...

[mj.scuba]

This is so easy, it hardly requires a rocket scientist to work it out.

Bush, like most failed leaders (And thick pillock), needed an enemy to cover his own stupidity. Muslims works well because few people know much about them and the tabloids love to print bull about someone in funny clothes.

When it comes to Blair, even easier. He did it for the cash. Mr Tony Blair, I'm sure most people will not be shocked to learn, is being paid millions by US interests.

 

Girls and boys, our ex PM screwed the country big style, killing a lot of people for money.

 

Yeah Bush needed those terrorists to fly planes into buildings and kill thousands.

[English]

Yeah Bush needed those terrorists to fly planes into buildings and kill thousands.

 

 

 

Bush had those planes flown into buildings and killed hundreds of thousands as a result!

[spindrift]

The Bush family have derived gigantic profits from the War On terror:

 

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5337